- Rank
- #98
- Total Output Tokens
- 40,466
- Response Time (avg)
- 13.30s
- Total Cost
- $3.471
Claude Fable 5.1 (high) vs Grok 4.6 (medium)
Claude Fable 5.1 (high) leads on average score with 7.9 vs 7.8. Grok 4.6 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $2.270 vs $3.471. Claude Fable 5.1 (high) is faster at 13.30s vs 74.77s, with pass rates of 85.5% vs 78.3%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #107
- Total Output Tokens
- 266,197
- Response Time (avg)
- 74.77s
- Total Cost
- $2.270
Recommended model
Claude Fable 5.1 (high)
It has the best score here (7.9), while responding about 5.6x faster than Grok 4.6 (medium).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 Claude Fable 5.1 high | Grok 4.6 Grok 4.6 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 7.9 | 7.8 |
| Rank | #98 | #107 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 85.5% | 78.3% |
| Flaky tests | 1 | 4 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 18.264 | 14.187 |
| Total Cost | $3.471 | $2.270 |
| Input Price | $10.000 / 1M | $2.000 / 1M |
| Output Price | $50.000 / 1M | $6.000 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 144,676 | 336,351 |
| Output Tokens | 8,184 | 6,180 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 32,282 | 260,017 |
| Response Time (avg) | 13.30s | 74.77s |
| Response Time (max) | 40.17s | 514.35s |
| Response Time (total) | 305.83s | 1719.73s |
| Parameters | ~9.5T total (~878B active) | ~1.7T total (~170B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Closed |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#98 Claude Fable 5.1
high- Cost
- $0.384
- Time
- 102.5s
- Tokens
- 7,824 tok
#107 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6
medium- Cost
- $0.028
- Time
- 72.1s
- Tokens
- 4,771 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 6.93s | 8,718 | 254 | 141 | |
| Grok 4.6 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 103.61s | 229,564 | 1,369 | 15,020 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.90s | 858 | 287 | 790 | |
| Grok 4.6 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 10.84s | 2,991 | 78 | 6,335 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 8.4 | 7.4 | 88.9% | 1 | 13.91s | 10,608 | 520 | 6,503 | |
| Grok 4.6 | 8.2 | 7.2 | 88.9% | 1 | 120.05s | 9,579 | 351 | 64,226 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 34.59s | 98,419 | 5,484 | 5,373 | |
| Grok 4.6 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 62.66s | 68,060 | 3,687 | 21,366 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.30s | 10,515 | 312 | 403 | |
| Grok 4.6 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 11.46s | 8,937 | 225 | 4,400 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 24.34s | 990 | 63 | 12,436 | |
| Grok 4.6 | 5.3 | 7.2 | 44.4% | 1 | 304.33s | 2,523 | 15 | 127,702 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.40s | 714 | 291 | 0 | |
| Grok 4.6 | 4.1 | 2.7 | 33.3% | 1 | 17.27s | 1,077 | 47 | 2,052 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.60s | 921 | 97 | 263 | |
| Grok 4.6 | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 12.75s | 1,857 | 57 | 4,500 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.11s | 912 | 506 | 558 | |
| Grok 4.6 | 8.7 | 7.7 | 88.9% | 1 | 16.30s | 2,430 | 123 | 5,799 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 13.30s | 11,757 | 354 | 118 | |
| Grok 4.6 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 12.83s | 8,544 | 216 | 1,068 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 30.58s | 264 | 16 | 5,697 | |
| Grok 4.6 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 46.88s | 789 | 12 | 7,549 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Claude Fable 5.1highvsGLM 5.3 FlashXmaxClaude Fable 5.1highvsGPT-5.4 MinimediumClaude Fable 5.1highvsQwen3.5-27BmediumGrok 4.6mediumvsGLM 5.3highClaude Fable 5.1highvsQwen3.7 MaxnoneClaude Fable 5.1highvsGPT-5.6 TerralowQwen3.7 PlusnonevsGrok 4.6mediumClaude Fable 5.1highvsGemini 3.8 FlashmediumClaude Fable 5.1highvsGPT-5.4 NanomediumClaude Fable 5.1highvsGemini 3.5 FlashmediumQwen3.8 2.4T A95BhighvsGrok 4.6mediumClaude Fable 5.1highvsMiMo-V2.6-Flashmedium