- Rank
- #116
- Total Output Tokens
- 40,466
- Response Time (avg)
- 13.30s
- Total Cost
- $3.471
Claude Fable 5.1 (high) vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (high)
Claude Fable 5.1 (high) leads on average score with 7.9 vs 7.9. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $2.949 vs $3.471. Claude Fable 5.1 (high) is faster at 13.30s vs 120.88s, with pass rates of 85.5% vs 75.4%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #120
- Total Output Tokens
- 368,836
- Response Time (avg)
- 120.88s
- Total Cost
- $2.949
Recommended model
Claude Fable 5.1 (high)
It has the best score here (7.9), while responding about 9.1x faster than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (high).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 Claude Fable 5.1 high | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B high |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 7.9 | 7.9 |
| Rank | #116 | #120 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 9.6 |
| Consistency | 9.7 | 8.4 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 85.5% | 75.4% |
| Flaky tests | 1 | 4 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 18.264 | 18.696 |
| Total Cost | $3.471 | $2.949 |
| Input Price | $10.000 / 1M | $2.000 / 1M |
| Output Price | $50.000 / 1M | $6.000 / 1M |
| Cache Read Price | $0.250 / 1M | $0.250 / 1M |
| Cache Write Price | $12.500 / 1M | N/A |
| Total Input Tokens | 144,676 | 295,642 |
| Output Tokens | 8,184 | 115,041 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 32,282 | 353,398 |
| Response Time (avg) | 13.30s | 120.88s |
| Response Time (max) | 40.17s | 532.28s |
| Response Time (total) | 305.83s | 2780.16s |
| Parameters | ~9.5T total (~878B active) | 2.4T total (95B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Weights available |
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#116 Claude Fable 5.1
high- Cost
- $0.384
- Time
- 102.5s
- Tokens
- 7,824 tok
#120 Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
high
Reached the allocated time limit (600 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 600.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 6.93s | 8,718 | 254 | 141 | |
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 127.11s | 186,711 | 2,240 | 10,171 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.90s | 858 | 287 | 790 | |
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 24.22s | 1,128 | 305 | 4,864 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 8.4 | 7.4 | 88.9% | 1 | 13.91s | 10,608 | 520 | 6,503 | |
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 5.9 | 6.3 | 55.6% | 1 | 160.52s | 6,399 | 3,310 | 48,078 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 34.59s | 98,419 | 5,484 | 5,373 | |
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 6.9 | 5.9 | 66.7% | 1 | 266.12s | 81,205 | 7,791 | 41,921 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.30s | 10,515 | 312 | 403 | |
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 13.67s | 7,928 | 550 | 2,307 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 24.34s | 990 | 63 | 12,436 | |
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 4.1 | 6.5 | 22.2% | 1 | 301.08s | 964 | 11,279 | 139,028 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.40s | 714 | 291 | 0 | |
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 6.1 | 3.1 | 66.7% | 1 | 11.38s | 630 | 2,020 | 2,165 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.60s | 921 | 97 | 263 | |
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 11.45s | 927 | 245 | 1,727 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.11s | 912 | 506 | 558 | |
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 65.54s | 989 | 698 | 15,073 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 13.30s | 11,757 | 354 | 118 | |
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 32.93s | 8,481 | 302 | 656 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 30.58s | 264 | 16 | 5,697 | |
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 347.95s | 280 | 86,301 | 87,408 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Claude Fable 5.1highvsGLM 5.3 FlashXmaxGemini 3.5 FlashmediumvsQwen3.8 2.4T A95BhighClaude Fable 5.1highvsGPT-5.4 MinimediumClaude Fable 5.1highvsQwen3.5-27BmediumQwen3.8 2.4T A95BhighvsMiMo-V2.6-FlashmediumMuse WondermaxvsQwen3.8 2.4T A95BhighClaude Fable 5.1highvsQwen3.7 MaxnoneClaude Fable 5.1highvsGPT-5.6 TerralowClaude Fable 5.1highvsQwen3.8 Flash NextlowQwen3.8 2.4T A95BhighvsGrok 4.5mediumClaude Fable 5.1highvsGemini 3.8 FlashmediumClaude Fable 5.1highvsGPT-5.4 Nanomedium