Puzzle Solving Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Puzzle Solving, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Tests Correct ↑.
311/311
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Puzzle Solving Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #280 | Cobuddy medium | Baidu | 3.6 | 4.7 | $0.000 | 0/3 | 12.8s |
| #281 | Mercury 2 none | Inception | 3.1 | 4.7 | $0.030 | 0/3 | 535ms |
| #282 | Granite 4.2 8B high | IBM Granite | 2.9 | 4.6 | $0.084 | 0/3 | 202.7s |
| #283 | Qwen3 Coder Next medium | Qwen | 3.0 | 4.6 | $0.034 | 0/3 | 1.25s |
| #285 | Laguna S 2.1 none | Poolside | 3.1 | 4.5 | $0.022 | 0/3 | 828ms |
| #287 | Laguna M.1 none | Poolside | 3.0 | 4.4 | $0.009 | 0/3 | 891ms |
| #288 | Elephant Alpha none | Openrouter | 4.2 | 4.3 | $0.000 | 0/3 | 807ms |
| #289 | GLM 4.7 Flash medium | Z.ai | 2.9 | 4.3 | $0.168 | 0/3 | 12.9s |
| #291 | Granite 4.2 8B none | IBM Granite | 3.0 | 4.3 | $0.026 | 0/3 | 107.6s |
| #295 | Hy3 preview none | Tencent | 3.1 | 4.0 | $0.007 | 0/3 | 4.56s |
| #297 | Ling 3.0 Tiny none | Inclusionai | 3.0 | 4.0 | $0.000 | 0/3 | 2.64s |
| #298 | Granite 4.1 8B none | IBM Granite | 3.2 | 4.0 | $0.007 | 0/3 | 608ms |
| #299 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning none | NVIDIA | 3.1 | 4.0 | $0.007 | 0/3 | 750ms |
| #301 | Ling 3.0 Tiny high | Inclusionai | 3.0 | 3.8 | $0.000 | 0/3 | 54.2s |
| #302 | Ling 3.0 Tiny low | Inclusionai | 3.0 | 3.8 | $0.000 | 0/3 | 32.5s |