Instructions following Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Instructions following, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Total Cost ↓.
461/461
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Instructions following Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #287 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 none | Qwen | 0.6 | 0.6 | $0.216 | 1/2 | 1.17s |
| #242 | GLM 5.3 low | Z.ai | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.215 | 2/2 | 3.40s |
| #164 | GLM 5.3 FlashX high | Z.ai | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.210 | 2/2 | 1.72s |
| #191 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash low | Xiaomi | 0.8 | 0.7 | $0.200 | 1/2 | 955ms |
| #188 | Qwen3.8 Flash Next xhigh | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.7 | ~$0.195 | 2/2 | 3.72s |
| #377 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning medium | NVIDIA | 0.9 | 0.5 | $0.195 | 1/2 | 3.75s |
| #403 | GLM 4.7 Flash medium | Z.ai | 0.6 | 0.4 | $0.193 | 1/2 | 2.97s |
| #294 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro none | Xiaomi | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.193 | 2/2 | 803ms |
| #211 | Qwen3.5-Flash medium | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.184 | 2/2 | 63.5s |
| #79 | GPT-6.1 Terra none | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.184 | 2/2 | 1.43s |
| #263 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite low | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.183 | 2/2 | 1.75s | |
| #29 | Gemini 3.7 Flash low | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.183 | 2/2 | 2.47s | |
| #314 | Seed 2.1 Turbo none | Bytedance Seed | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.182 | 2/2 | 1.82s |
| #140 | Qwen3.7 Plus none | Qwen | 0.6 | 0.8 | $0.178 | 1/2 | 929ms |
| #268 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.176 | 2/2 | 1.67s |