Instructions following Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Instructions following, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↓.
461/461
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Instructions following Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #60 | Muse Spark 1.2 high | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.018 | 2/2 | 5.43s |
| #80 | Muse Spark 1.1 low | Meta | 0.7 | 0.9 | $0.885 | 1/2 | 5.42s |
| #196 | Kimi K2.7 Code medium | Moonshot AI | 1.0 | 0.7 | $1.136 | 2/2 | 5.39s |
| #278 | GLM 5 Turbo medium | Z.ai | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.323 | 2/2 | 5.38s |
| #369 | Ling 2.6 1t default | Inclusionai | 0.6 | 0.5 | $0.016 | 1/2 | 5.36s |
| #150 | Muse Glimmer 30B medium | Meta | 1.0 | 0.8 | $0.288 | 2/2 | 5.34s |
| #18 | Gemini 4 Argon high | 1.0 | 1.0 | $1.802 | 2/2 | 5.32s | |
| #281 | Claude Fable 5.1 low | Anthropic | 0.7 | 0.6 | $3.395 | 1/2 | 5.24s |
| #82 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 high | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.175 | 2/2 | 5.13s |
| #404 | gpt-oss-120b none | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.4 | $0.016 | 2/2 | 5.06s |
| #34 | Seed 2.1 Turbo low | Bytedance Seed | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.645 | 2/2 | 5.05s |
| #86 | Muse Spark 1.3 low | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.911 | 2/2 | 5.04s |
| #373 | Mimo V2 Omni medium | Xiaomi | 0.8 | 0.5 | $0.683 | 1/2 | 4.99s |
| #348 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning high | NVIDIA | 0.8 | 0.5 | $0.168 | 1/2 | 4.98s |
| #47 | Pareto default | Unbiased | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.520 | 2/2 | 4.95s |