Instructions following Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Instructions following, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Metric ↑.
461/461
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Instructions following Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #286 | Inkling none | Thinkingmachines | 0.6 | 0.6 | $0.292 | 1/2 | 1.72s |
| #300 | Qwen3.6 Flash none | Qwen | 0.6 | 0.6 | $0.139 | 1/2 | 1.10s |
| #303 | Qwen3.7 Flash none | Qwen | 0.6 | 0.6 | $0.028 | 1/2 | 892ms |
| #310 | Trinity Large Thinking high | Arcee AI | 0.6 | 0.6 | $0.794 | 1/2 | 4.12s |
| #312 | GPT-5.4 Mini none | OpenAI | 0.6 | 0.6 | $0.170 | 1/2 | 728ms |
| #322 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none | Qwen | 0.6 | 0.6 | $0.120 | 1/2 | 809ms |
| #329 | Gemma 4 26B A4B none | 0.6 | 0.5 | $0.031 | 1/2 | 690ms | |
| #333 | Qwen3.8 27B none | Qwen | 0.6 | 0.5 | ~$0.010 | 1/2 | 582ms |
| #362 | GPT-4o-mini default | OpenAI | 0.6 | 0.5 | $0.024 | 1/2 | 1.11s |
| #365 | Inkling Small none | Thinkingmachines | 0.6 | 0.5 | $0.054 | 1/2 | 767ms |
| #366 | Qwen3 Coder Next default | Qwen | 0.6 | 0.5 | $0.067 | 1/2 | 7.78s |
| #376 | Mercury 2.5 Preview default | Inception | 0.6 | 0.5 | $0.023 | 1/2 | 1.26s |
| #381 | Qwen3 Coder Next medium | Qwen | 0.6 | 0.5 | $0.071 | 1/2 | 7.49s |
| #383 | GPT-5.4 Nano none | OpenAI | 0.6 | 0.5 | $0.068 | 1/2 | 784ms |
| #395 | Nemotron 3 Super none | NVIDIA | 0.6 | 0.4 | $0.016 | 1/2 | 804ms |