Instructions following Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Instructions following, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↑.
461/461
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Instructions following Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #173 | Gemini 2.5 Flash medium | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.680 | 2/2 | 2.62s | |
| #390 | Owl Alpha default | Openrouter | 0.6 | 0.5 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 2.63s |
| #151 | Muse Wonder xhigh | Meta | 0.7 | 0.8 | $4.012 | 1/2 | 2.64s |
| #14 | GPT-6 Astra low | OpenAI | 1.0 | 1.0 | $2.160 | 2/2 | 2.65s |
| #244 | KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 high | Kwaipilot | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.506 | 2/2 | 2.67s |
| #342 | Kimi K2.5 none | Moonshot AI | 0.7 | 0.5 | $0.262 | 1/2 | 2.67s |
| #130 | Gemini 3.5 Flash medium | 1.0 | 0.8 | $1.316 | 2/2 | 2.70s | |
| #55 | Gemini 4 Argon medium | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.674 | 2/2 | 2.71s | |
| #24 | GPT-5.6 Sol high | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.595 | 2/2 | 2.73s |
| #257 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro medium | Xiaomi | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.332 | 2/2 | 2.77s |
| #17 | GPT-6.1 Terra medium | OpenAI | 0.8 | 1.0 | $0.291 | 1/2 | 2.77s |
| #181 | Claude Opus 4.8 low | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.7 | $3.787 | 2/2 | 2.78s |
| #180 | Gemini 3.8 Flash low | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.323 | 2/2 | 2.79s | |
| #141 | Grok 4.5 low | X AI | 1.0 | 0.8 | $1.345 | 2/2 | 2.80s |
| #187 | Claude Opus 5 none | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.7 | $2.766 | 2/2 | 2.81s |