AI BENCHY Category
Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Score ↓.
Models Shown
15
Average Data parsing and extraction Score
9.0
Best Model
Gemini 3 Flash Preview 10.0| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium | 10.0 | 10.0 | 2/2 | 4.72s | |
| #2 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium | 10.0 | 9.6 | 2/2 | 7.72s | |
| #3 | Claude Opus 4.7 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 9.2 | 2/2 | 2.37s |
| #4 | Claude Opus 4.7 none | Anthropic | 10.0 | 9.2 | 2/2 | 2.15s |
| #5 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview low | 10.0 | 8.8 | 2/2 | 9.40s | |
| #6 | Seed-2.0-Lite medium | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 8.6 | 2/2 | 9.07s |
| #7 | GPT-5.3-Codex medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.6 | 2/2 | 3.07s |
| #8 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.5 | 2/2 | 46.9s |
| #9 | Qwen3.6 Plus Preview medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.5 | 2/2 | 14.9s |
| #10 | Qwen3.5-27B medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.4 | 2/2 | 30.3s |
| #11 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high | 10.0 | 8.4 | 2/2 | 7.16s | |
| #12 | Gemini 3 PRO Preview medium | 10.0 | 8.4 | 2/2 | 10.8s | |
| #13 | GLM 5 medium | Z.ai | 7.1 | 8.4 | 1/2 | 8.90s |
| #14 | Gemma 4 31B medium | 10.0 | 8.3 | 2/2 | 21.1s | |
| #15 | Gemini 2.5 Flash medium | 10.0 | 8.2 | 2/2 | 4.06s |