AI BENCHY Category
Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Avg Score ↓.
Related Failure Reasons
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Avg Score | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium | 9.9 | 10.0 | 2/2 | 4.72s | |
| #2 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium | 9.9 | 9.4 | 2/2 | 7.72s | |
| #3 | GPT-5.3-Codex medium | OpenAI | 9.9 | 8.4 | 2/2 | 3.07s |
| #4 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium | Qwen | 9.9 | 8.3 | 2/2 | 46.9s |
| #5 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview low | 9.9 | 8.2 | 2/2 | 9.40s | |
| #6 | Gemini 3 Pro Preview medium | 9.9 | 8.2 | 2/2 | 10.8s | |
| #7 | Qwen3.5-27B medium | Qwen | 9.9 | 8.2 | 2/2 | 30.3s |
| #8 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high | 9.9 | 8.2 | 2/2 | 7.16s | |
| #9 | GPT-5.4 medium | OpenAI | 9.9 | 8.0 | 2/2 | 5.32s |
| #10 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium | Qwen | 9.9 | 7.7 | 2/2 | 23.4s |
| #11 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 9.9 | 7.7 | 2/2 | 13.9s |
| #12 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview medium | 9.9 | 7.5 | 2/2 | 2.29s | |
| #13 | Step 3.5 Flash medium | Stepfun | 10.0 | 7.4 | 2/2 | 15.0s |
| #14 | GLM 5 medium | Z.ai | 5.0 | 7.4 | 1/2 | 8.90s |
| #15 | GPT-5.2 Chat none | OpenAI | 9.9 | 7.4 | 2/2 | 3.05s |
| #16 | Gemini 2.5 Flash medium | 9.9 | 7.4 | 2/2 | 4.06s | |
| #17 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low | 9.9 | 7.3 | 2/2 | 3.00s | |
| #18 | DeepSeek V3.2 medium | DeepSeek | 9.9 | 7.3 | 2/2 | 36.1s |
| #19 | GPT-5.3 Chat none | OpenAI | 9.9 | 7.3 | 2/2 | 2.21s |
| #20 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview none | 9.9 | 7.2 | 2/2 | 1.41s | |
| #21 | MiMo-V2-Flash medium | Xiaomi | 5.5 | 7.2 | 1/2 | 0ms |
| #22 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none | 9.9 | 7.1 | 2/2 | 1.22s | |
| #23 | Seed-2.0-Mini medium | Bytedance Seed | 9.9 | 6.9 | 2/2 | 24.3s |
| #24 | Qwen3.5-Flash medium | Qwen | 5.5 | 6.9 | 1/2 | 57.0s |
| #25 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 none | Anthropic | 9.9 | 6.8 | 2/2 | 3.43s |
| #26 | Claude Opus 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 9.9 | 6.6 | 2/2 | 7.37s |
| #27 | GPT-5.2 medium | OpenAI | 9.9 | 6.5 | 2/2 | 3.15s |
| #28 | Kimi K2.5 medium | Moonshot AI | 9.9 | 6.4 | 2/2 | 49.8s |
| #29 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none | Qwen | 9.9 | 6.2 | 2/2 | 1.89s |
| #30 | Grok 4.1 Fast medium | X AI | 9.9 | 6.2 | 2/2 | 6.63s |
| #31 | GLM 5 none | Z.ai | 9.9 | 6.0 | 2/2 | 5.78s |
| #32 | GPT-5 Mini medium | OpenAI | 9.9 | 6.0 | 2/2 | 12.6s |
| #33 | DeepSeek V3.2 none | DeepSeek | 5.4 | 5.5 | 1/2 | 9.42s |
| #34 | GPT-5 Nano medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 5.5 | 0/2 | 21.4s |
| #35 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium | Qwen | 5.5 | 5.5 | 1/2 | 59.3s |
| #36 | Mercury 2 medium | Inception | 5.5 | 5.3 | 1/2 | 1.11s |
| #37 | Qwen3.5-Flash none | Qwen | 9.9 | 5.2 | 2/2 | 1.57s |
| #38 | Gemini 2.5 Flash none | 9.9 | 5.2 | 2/2 | 652ms | |
| #39 | gpt-oss-120b medium | OpenAI | 5.5 | 5.1 | 1/2 | 1.98s |
| #40 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none | Qwen | 9.9 | 5.0 | 2/2 | 1.01s |
| #41 | Qwen3.5-27B none | Qwen | 9.9 | 4.9 | 2/2 | 1.43s |
| #42 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none | Qwen | 9.9 | 4.7 | 2/2 | 1.16s |
| #43 | MiniMax M2.5 medium | Minimax | 10.0 | 4.7 | 0/2 | 7.48s |
| #44 | GPT-5.4 none | OpenAI | 9.9 | 4.5 | 2/2 | 1.04s |
| #45 | Trinity Large Preview none | Arcee AI | 9.9 | 4.2 | 2/2 | 3.26s |
| #46 | Kimi K2.5 none | Moonshot AI | 5.4 | 4.1 | 1/2 | 42.1s |
| #47 | GPT-4o-mini none | OpenAI | 9.9 | 4.0 | 2/2 | 1.27s |
| #48 | Qwen3 Coder Next none | Qwen | 5.4 | 4.0 | 1/2 | 1.32s |
| #49 | GLM 4.7 Flash none | Z.ai | 5.4 | 3.9 | 1/2 | 4.82s |
| #50 | Qwen3 Coder Next medium | Qwen | 5.4 | 3.5 | 1/2 | 81.8s |
| #51 | Mercury 2 none | Inception | 5.5 | 3.4 | 1/2 | 667ms |
| #52 | GLM 4.7 Flash medium | Z.ai | 5.0 | 3.1 | 1/2 | 1.51s |
| #53 | Grok 4.1 Fast none | X AI | 9.9 | 2.9 | 2/2 | 943ms |
| #54 | MiMo-V2-Flash none | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 2.9 | 0/2 | 19.7s |
| #55 | LFM2-24B-A2B none | Liquid | 10.0 | 2.6 | 0/2 | 714ms |