Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↓.
343/343
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #159 | Qwen3.7 Flash medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.9 | $0.065 | 2/2 | 15.4s |
| #229 | Step 3.5 Flash medium | Stepfun | 10.0 | 5.9 | $0.132 | 2/2 | 15.0s |
| #88 | Qwen3.6 Plus medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.8 | $0.418 | 2/2 | 14.9s |
| #294 | Qwen3.6 Plus Preview medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 4.9 | $0.000 | 2/2 | 14.9s |
| #112 | MiniMax M3 medium | Minimax | 10.0 | 7.5 | $0.300 | 2/2 | 14.9s |
| #139 | Muse Glimmer 30B high | Meta | 7.3 | 7.2 | $0.430 | 1/2 | 14.9s |
| #163 | Step 3.7 Flash high | Stepfun | 10.0 | 6.8 | $1.229 | 2/2 | 14.7s |
| #221 | Trinity Large Thinking low | Arcee AI | 7.3 | 6.0 | $0.625 | 1/2 | 14.3s |
| #254 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning high | NVIDIA | 7.3 | 5.6 | $0.133 | 1/2 | 14.0s |
| #302 | Trinity Large Thinking high | Arcee AI | 6.3 | 4.8 | $0.592 | 1/2 | 14.0s |
| #92 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 7.8 | $2.126 | 2/2 | 13.9s |
| #125 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B high | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.4 | $2.357 | 2/2 | 13.7s |
| #90 | GLM 5.2 medium | Z.ai | 10.0 | 7.8 | $0.151 | 2/2 | 13.4s |
| #186 | Qwen3.6 35B A3B medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.6 | $0.750 | 2/2 | 13.0s |
| #195 | Dots 3 Note Preview high | Dots Studio | 7.3 | 6.4 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 12.7s |