Data parsing and extraction Model Ranking

AI BENCHY Category

See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↓.

Models Shown

Average Data parsing and extraction Score

9.0

Best Model

Qwen3.5-9B 3.6

Failure Reasons

With failure reason Wrong answer19 With failure reason API error6 With failure reason Extra formatting2 With failure reason No answer2 With failure reason Timed out1

Rank	Model	Company	Data parsing and extraction Score	Score	Tests Correct	Response Time (avg)
#17	Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview medium	Google	10.0	8.2	2/2	2.29s
#35	MiMo-V2-Omni medium	Xiaomi	10.0	7.7	2/2	2.29s
#48	Gemma 4 31B none	Google	10.0	6.9	2/2	2.25s
#36	GPT-5.3 Chat none	OpenAI	10.0	7.7	2/2	2.21s
#4	Claude Opus 4.7 none	Anthropic	10.0	9.2	2/2	2.15s
#68	gpt-oss-120b medium	OpenAI	6.4	5.8	1/2	1.98s
#49	Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none	Qwen	10.0	6.8	2/2	1.89s
#61	Seed-2.0-Lite none	Bytedance Seed	10.0	6.2	2/2	1.82s
#60	Gemma 4 26B A4B none	Google	10.0	6.2	2/2	1.70s
#55	MiMo-V2-Omni none	Xiaomi	10.0	6.5	2/2	1.69s
#59	Qwen3.5-Flash none	Qwen	10.0	6.2	2/2	1.57s
#93	GLM 4.7 Flash medium	Z.ai	6.3	4.6	1/2	1.51s
#67	Qwen3.5-27B none	Qwen	10.0	5.9	2/2	1.43s
#21	Gemini 3 Flash Preview none	Google	10.0	8.1	2/2	1.41s
#65	MiMo-V2-Pro none	Xiaomi	10.0	6.0	2/2	1.39s

←

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

→

Data parsing and extraction Ranking

Top Models by Data parsing and extraction Score

Data parsing and extraction Score vs Total Cost

Top Models by Response Time (avg)