Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Tests Correct ↓.
311/311
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #226 | KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 medium | Kwaipilot | 6.5 | 5.6 | $0.048 | 1/2 | 3.65s |
| #227 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning high | NVIDIA | 7.3 | 5.6 | $0.134 | 1/2 | 14.0s |
| #228 | Hy4 preview low | Tencent | 8.7 | 5.6 | $1.745 | 1/2 | 88.5s |
| #229 | Qwen3.6 27B none | Qwen | 7.3 | 5.5 | $0.116 | 1/2 | 2.06s |
| #230 | Hy3 preview low | Tencent | 6.5 | 5.5 | $0.042 | 1/2 | 5.85s |
| #231 | Qwen3.8 27B none | Qwen | 6.5 | 5.5 | ~$0.006 | 1/2 | 1.14s |
| #235 | KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 low | Kwaipilot | 6.5 | 5.4 | $0.046 | 1/2 | 2.82s |
| #238 | Kimi K2.5 none | Moonshot AI | 7.3 | 5.4 | $0.101 | 1/2 | 42.1s |
| #249 | Granite 4.2 8B medium | IBM Granite | 6.5 | 5.2 | $0.009 | 1/2 | 1.43s |
| #252 | Mistral Small 4 medium | Mistral | 7.3 | 5.1 | $0.097 | 1/2 | 1.23s |
| #253 | Granite 4.2 8B low | IBM Granite | 6.5 | 5.1 | $0.012 | 1/2 | 1.39s |
| #254 | Qwen3 Coder Next none | Qwen | 6.5 | 5.1 | $0.026 | 1/2 | 1.32s |
| #255 | MiMo-V2.5 none | Xiaomi | 6.5 | 5.1 | $0.025 | 1/2 | 1.01s |
| #259 | MiniMax M2.7 medium | Minimax | 6.3 | 5.0 | $0.208 | 1/2 | 21.9s |
| #260 | Mercury 2.5 Preview low | Inception | 6.3 | 5.0 | $0.011 | 1/2 | 1.12s |