Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Total Cost ↓.
Models Shown
15
Average Data parsing and extraction Score
8.8
Best Model
Grok 4.20 Multi Agent Beta 10.0
316/316
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #309 | Qwen3.5-9B medium | Qwen | 3.6 | 3.8 | $0.062 | 0/2 | 87.3s |
| #234 | Qwen3.6 27B none | Qwen | 7.3 | 5.5 | $0.062 | 1/2 | 2.06s |
| #195 | Qwen3.6 Flash none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.062 | 2/2 | 2.13s |
| #39 | GLM 5.3 Flash max | Z.ai | 10.0 | 8.7 | $0.059 | 2/2 | 6.10s |
| #163 | Qwen3.5-27B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.6 | $0.058 | 2/2 | 1.43s |
| #81 | Qwen3.8 27B medium | Qwen | 6.5 | 7.8 | ~$0.058 | 1/2 | 8.76s |
| #298 | Grok 4.20 none | X AI | 10.0 | 4.1 | $0.057 | 2/2 | 522ms |
| #219 | Inkling Small low | Thinkingmachines | 10.0 | 5.7 | $0.055 | 2/2 | 1.25s |
| #267 | DeepSeek V3.2 none | DeepSeek | 6.3 | 5.0 | $0.054 | 1/2 | 9.42s |
| #246 | Inkling Small none | Thinkingmachines | 10.0 | 5.3 | $0.054 | 2/2 | 782ms |
| #239 | Laguna S 2.1 medium | Poolside | 10.0 | 5.4 | $0.053 | 2/2 | 2.42s |
| #84 | Qwen3.7 Flash high | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.8 | $0.052 | 2/2 | 20.1s |
| #226 | GLM 5V Turbo none | Z.ai | 10.0 | 5.6 | $0.052 | 2/2 | 3.81s |
| #173 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none | 10.0 | 6.4 | $0.052 | 2/2 | 1.22s | |
| #185 | GPT-5.6 Luna low | OpenAI | 10.0 | 6.2 | $0.051 | 2/2 | 2.14s |