AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Category

Data parsing and extraction Ranking

See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Score ↑.

Models Shown

15

Average Data parsing and extraction Score

8.7

Rank Model Company Data parsing and extraction Score Score Tests Correct Response Time (avg)
#163 Granite 4.1 8B none IBM Granite 3.0 4.0 0/2 575ms
#162 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30b A3b Reasoning none NVIDIA 3.8 4.1 0/2 1.42s
#161 Qwen3.5-9B medium Qwen 3.6 4.2 0/2 87.3s
#160 LFM2-24B-A2B none Liquid 3.0 4.2 0/2 714ms
#159 Ling-2.6-1T none Inclusionai 10.0 4.3 2/2 1.37s
#158 GLM 4.7 Flash medium Z.ai 6.3 4.4 1/2 1.51s
#157 Grok 4.1 Fast none X AI 10.0 4.4 2/2 943ms
#156 Hy3 preview none Tencent 6.5 4.4 1/2 2.85s
#155 Mercury 2 none Inception 7.3 4.5 1/2 667ms
#154 Qwen3.5-9B none Qwen 10.0 4.6 2/2 847ms
#153 Qwen3.6 35B A3B none Qwen 10.0 4.6 2/2 1.46s
#152 MiMo-V2-Flash none Xiaomi 2.9 4.6 0/2 19.7s
#151 Trinity Large Preview none Arcee AI 10.0 4.6 2/2 3.26s
#150 Qwen3 Coder Next medium Qwen 6.5 4.6 1/2 81.8s
#149 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30b A3b Reasoning medium NVIDIA 7.3 4.6 1/2 2.72s

Top Models by Data parsing and extraction Score

Data parsing and extraction Score vs Total Cost

Top Models by Response Time (avg)