Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Score ↑.
343/343
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #343 | LFM2-24B-A2B none | Liquid | 3.0 | 2.2 | $0.001 | 0/2 | 714ms |
| #342 | Step 3.5 Flash none | Stepfun | 1.5 | 2.3 | $0.020 | 0/1 | 0ms |
| #341 | Jev 1.13 none | Typesafe | 10.0 | 3.2 | $0.003 | 2/2 | 799ms |
| #340 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30b A3b Reasoning none | NVIDIA | 3.8 | 3.2 | $0.000 | 0/2 | 1.42s |
| #339 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30b A3b Reasoning medium | NVIDIA | 7.3 | 3.4 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 2.72s |
| #338 | gpt-oss-120b none | OpenAI | 6.5 | 3.7 | $0.033 | 1/2 | 7.12s |
| #337 | Laguna Xs.2 none | Poolside | 10.0 | 3.8 | $0.004 | 2/2 | 646ms |
| #336 | Ling 3.0 Tiny medium | Inclusionai | 2.7 | 3.8 | $0.000 | 0/2 | 4.41s |
| #335 | Qwen3.5-9B medium | Qwen | 3.6 | 3.8 | $0.062 | 0/2 | 87.3s |
| #334 | Grok 4.1 Fast none | X AI | 10.0 | 3.8 | $0.008 | 2/2 | 943ms |
| #333 | Ling 3.0 Tiny low | Inclusionai | 2.8 | 3.8 | $0.000 | 0/2 | 4.82s |
| #332 | Ling 3.0 Tiny high | Inclusionai | 2.8 | 3.8 | $0.000 | 0/2 | 4.16s |
| #331 | Mercury 2.5 none | Inception | 2.8 | 3.9 | $0.016 | 0/2 | 885ms |
| #330 | Grok Build 0.1 none | X AI | 3.8 | 4.0 | $0.547 | 0/2 | 9.33s |
| #329 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning none | NVIDIA | 6.5 | 4.0 | $0.006 | 1/2 | 633ms |