Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Metric ↑.
330/330
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #10 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium | 10.0 | 9.5 | $0.763 | 2/2 | 5.43s | |
| #11 | Gemini 3.5 Flash high | 10.0 | 9.4 | $2.011 | 2/2 | 6.43s | |
| #12 | Gemini 3.7 Flash medium | 10.0 | 9.4 | $0.309 | 2/2 | 3.33s | |
| #13 | GPT-5.6 Sol medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.4 | $0.508 | 2/2 | 1.38s |
| #14 | GPT-6 Astra medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.4 | $1.774 | 2/2 | 1.95s |
| #15 | GPT-5.6 Sol high | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.4 | $0.446 | 2/2 | 1.16s |
| #16 | GPT-5.5 low | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.3 | $1.257 | 2/2 | 3.28s |
| #17 | Grok 4.6 high | X AI | 10.0 | 9.3 | $1.908 | 2/2 | 16.1s |
| #18 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium | 10.0 | 9.2 | $1.352 | 2/2 | 7.72s | |
| #19 | Gemini 3.7 Flash low | 10.0 | 9.2 | $0.207 | 2/2 | 2.15s | |
| #20 | Claude Opus 5 high | Anthropic | 10.0 | 9.2 | $3.070 | 2/2 | 4.22s |
| #21 | Claude Opus 5 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 9.2 | $1.586 | 2/2 | 3.92s |
| #22 | Gemini 3.8 Flash medium | 10.0 | 9.1 | $0.653 | 2/2 | 5.74s | |
| #23 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) low | Qwen | 10.0 | 9.1 | $0.664 | 2/2 | 9.94s |
| #24 | Seed 2.1 Turbo low | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 9.1 | $1.546 | 2/2 | 34.5s |