Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Tests Correct ↑.
359/359
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #59 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash medium | DeepSeek | 6.5 | 8.5 | $0.225 | 1/2 | 3.77s |
| #71 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash max | DeepSeek | 6.5 | 8.3 | $0.445 | 1/2 | 4.56s |
| #90 | Kimi K3 max | Moonshot AI | 7.3 | 7.9 | $3.467 | 1/2 | 16.7s |
| #101 | Qwen3.8 27B medium | Qwen | 6.5 | 7.8 | ~$0.058 | 1/2 | 8.76s |
| #103 | Claude Opus 4.8 low | Anthropic | 6.3 | 7.8 | $2.089 | 1/2 | 2.27s |
| #105 | GLM 5 medium | Z.ai | 7.1 | 7.7 | $0.228 | 1/2 | 8.90s |
| #132 | LongCat 2.0 medium | Meituan | 6.3 | 7.4 | $0.499 | 1/2 | 10.6s |
| #140 | GLM 5.3 Flash high | Z.ai | 7.3 | 7.3 | $0.057 | 1/2 | 2.73s |
| #144 | Claude Opus 4.8 none | Anthropic | 7.3 | 7.3 | $1.166 | 1/2 | 1.77s |
| #147 | Muse Glimmer 30B high | Meta | 7.3 | 7.2 | $0.430 | 1/2 | 14.9s |
| #151 | Muse Glimmer 30B medium | Meta | 7.3 | 7.2 | $0.227 | 1/2 | 7.20s |
| #154 | Step 3.7 Flash low | Stepfun | 7.3 | 7.1 | $0.390 | 1/2 | 2.29s |
| #163 | Mercury 2 medium | Inception | 7.3 | 7.0 | $0.094 | 1/2 | 1.11s |
| #167 | KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 medium | Kwaipilot | 7.3 | 6.9 | $0.478 | 1/2 | 4.70s |
| #171 | Gemini 3.5 Flash none | 6.5 | 6.9 | $1.093 | 1/2 | 8.10s |