AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com
#485

d1.1

Liquid Release: 2026-10-27 Tested on: 2026-11-09 21:39 liquid/d1.1::none
-OtherClosed

Summary

d1.1 scores 1.4 on AI BENCHY and ranks #485. It has 10.0 reliability, a 10.1% pass rate, $0.001 total cost, and 845ms average response time.

What makes d1.1 unique: It stands out most in Coding, where it ranks #1, while Data parsing and extraction is its weakest area at #9.

Model facts

Researched on 2026-11-09

Parameters
-
Architecture
Other
Availability
Closed
License
-

Successor to d1, served only through the Liquid API as a System One decision endpoint with text and image input. Liquid does not disclose parameter counts or architecture; its open-weight decision models (d1-2B, d1-omni) are separate checkpoints.

Score

1.4

Consistency

3.8

Total Output Tokens

0

Total Input Tokens

34,410

Input Price

$0.020 / 1M

Output Price

$0.000 / 1M

Cache Read Price

$0.020 / 1M

Cache Write Price

N/A

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Tests Correct

Wrong Tests: 11

Attempt pass rate: 10.1%

Benchmark coverage: 36/69 attempts. Choices supplied by adapters. Supports 12/23 tests. Other tests are unsupported, not failed. Score uses the full suite.

Flaky tests

4

Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).

Response Time (avg)

845ms

Response Time (max): 1.48s

Response Time (total): 10.13s

Charts

Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Quick Compare

Category Breakdown

Category Score Consistency Tests Correct
Agentic 0.0 0.0
Anti-AI Tricks 3.9 3.3
Coding 2.3 6.6
Combined 0.0 0.0
Data parsing and extraction 2.9 5.8
Domain specific 2.9 7.2
General Intelligence 0.0 0.0
Instructions following 1.5 5.0
Puzzle Solving 1.7 3.3
Tool Calling 0.0 0.0
Trivia 0.0 0.0

Compared models