Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↑.
216/216
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #8 | GPT-5.6 Sol high | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.4 | $1.234 | 2/2 | 1.16s |
| #133 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.106 | 2/2 | 1.16s |
| #91 | GPT-5.5 none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 6.9 | $0.544 | 2/2 | 1.18s |
| #112 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none | 10.0 | 6.4 | $0.052 | 2/2 | 1.22s | |
| #173 | Mistral Small 4 medium | Mistral | 7.3 | 5.1 | $0.096 | 1/2 | 1.23s |
| #180 | GPT-4o-mini none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 5.0 | $0.010 | 2/2 | 1.27s |
| #142 | GPT-5.4 Mini none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 5.9 | $0.095 | 2/2 | 1.30s |
| #172 | Qwen3 Coder Next none | Qwen | 6.5 | 5.1 | $0.025 | 1/2 | 1.32s |
| #160 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro none | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 5.5 | $0.068 | 2/2 | 1.32s |
| #144 | Kimi K2.6 none | Moonshot AI | 10.0 | 5.8 | $0.184 | 2/2 | 1.32s |
| #63 | Qwen3.7 Max none | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.4 | $0.197 | 2/2 | 1.35s |
| #168 | Ling-2.6-1T none | Inclusionai | 10.0 | 5.3 | $0.016 | 2/2 | 1.37s |
| #7 | GPT-5.6 Sol medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.4 | $1.316 | 2/2 | 1.38s |
| #153 | Mimo V2 PRO none | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 5.6 | $0.045 | 2/2 | 1.39s |
| #93 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview none | 10.0 | 6.8 | $0.085 | 2/2 | 1.41s |