AI BENCHY Category
Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↑.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #124 | Kimi K2.6 none | Moonshot AI | 10.0 | 5.5 | 2/2 | 1.32s |
| #34 | Qwen3.7 Max none | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.7 | 2/2 | 1.35s |
| #159 | Ling-2.6-1T none | Inclusionai | 10.0 | 4.3 | 2/2 | 1.37s |
| #120 | Mimo V2 PRO none | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 5.6 | 2/2 | 1.39s |
| #48 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview none | 10.0 | 7.4 | 2/2 | 1.41s | |
| #162 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30b A3b Reasoning none | NVIDIA | 3.8 | 4.1 | 0/2 | 1.42s |
| #115 | Qwen3.5-27B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 5.7 | 2/2 | 1.43s |
| #88 | Qwen3.7 Plus none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.4 | 2/2 | 1.43s |
| #61 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite low | 10.0 | 7.2 | 2/2 | 1.44s | |
| #153 | Qwen3.6 35B A3B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 4.6 | 2/2 | 1.46s |
| #158 | GLM 4.7 Flash medium | Z.ai | 6.3 | 4.4 | 1/2 | 1.51s |
| #108 | Qwen3.5-Flash none | Qwen | 10.0 | 5.8 | 2/2 | 1.57s |
| #32 | Gemini 3.5 Flash minimal | 10.0 | 7.7 | 2/2 | 1.66s | |
| #102 | Gemma 4 26B A4B none | 10.0 | 6.0 | 2/2 | 1.70s | |
| #101 | Mimo V2 Omni none | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 6.0 | 2/2 | 1.76s |