Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↑.
451/451
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #173 | Qwen3.7 Flash high | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.063 | 2/2 | 20.1s |
| #201 | Kimi K2.6 medium | Moonshot AI | 1.0 | 0.7 | $1.594 | 2/2 | 20.4s |
| #97 | Ling 3.1 Flash medium | Inclusionai | 1.0 | 0.8 | $0.000 | 2/2 | 20.9s |
| #205 | GPT-6 Sol none | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.551 | 2/2 | 21.0s |
| #197 | Gemma 4 31B medium | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.144 | 2/2 | 21.1s | |
| #302 | GPT-5 Nano medium | OpenAI | 0.4 | 0.6 | $0.159 | 0/2 | 21.4s |
| #379 | Owl Alpha medium | Openrouter | 1.0 | 0.5 | $0.000 | 2/2 | 21.6s |
| #98 | Qwen3.7 Plus medium | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.8 | $0.415 | 2/2 | 21.7s |
| #260 | Ling 3.1 Flash low | Inclusionai | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.000 | 2/2 | 21.8s |
| #351 | MiniMax M2.7 medium | Minimax | 0.6 | 0.5 | $0.326 | 1/2 | 21.9s |
| #83 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B low | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.8 | $4.016 | 2/2 | 22.3s |
| #363 | Hy4 preview none | Tencent | 0.9 | 0.5 | $0.165 | 1/2 | 22.8s |
| #401 | Hunter Alpha medium | OpenRouter | 1.0 | 0.4 | $0.000 | 2/2 | 23.2s |
| #368 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning medium | NVIDIA | 0.4 | 0.5 | $0.195 | 0/2 | 23.2s |
| #190 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.7 | $1.152 | 2/2 | 23.4s |