Coding Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Coding, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Tests Correct ↓.
404/404
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Coding Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #146 | LongCat 2.0 high | Meituan | 0.8 | 0.7 | $0.778 | 2/3 | 505.3s |
| #148 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite medium | 0.8 | 0.7 | $0.440 | 2/3 | 9.96s | |
| #154 | Qwen3.7 Flash high | Qwen | 0.8 | 0.7 | $0.063 | 2/3 | 58.8s |
| #157 | Step 3.7 Flash low | Stepfun | 0.8 | 0.7 | $0.449 | 2/3 | 9.46s |
| #158 | Qwen3.6 27B medium | Qwen | 0.8 | 0.7 | $1.021 | 2/3 | 143.0s |
| #160 | Qwen3.8 Flash Next xhigh | Qwen | 0.7 | 0.7 | ~$0.195 | 2/3 | 192.2s |
| #162 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash low | Xiaomi | 0.8 | 0.7 | $0.200 | 2/3 | 11.0s |
| #164 | GPT-5.2 Chat default | OpenAI | 0.9 | 0.7 | $0.594 | 2/3 | 9.82s |
| #165 | Qwen3.6 Max Preview medium | Qwen | 0.9 | 0.7 | $1.132 | 2/3 | 146.5s |
| #167 | Kimi K2.7 Code medium | Moonshot AI | 0.8 | 0.7 | $1.136 | 2/3 | 146.7s |
| #172 | Muse Glimmer 30B low | Meta | 0.8 | 0.7 | $0.219 | 2/3 | 16.5s |
| #174 | Ember-1 high | Fireworks | 0.8 | 0.7 | $2.405 | 2/3 | 72.2s |
| #182 | Mercury 2.5 Preview medium | Inception | 0.8 | 0.7 | $0.039 | 2/3 | 3.86s |
| #201 | Mercury 2 medium | Inception | 0.8 | 0.7 | $0.121 | 2/3 | 2.04s |
| #203 | KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 low | Kwaipilot | 0.8 | 0.7 | $0.568 | 2/3 | 24.9s |