Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro

average score iko karibu sawa: 6.9 vs 6.9. MiMo-V2.5-Pro (medium) ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.187 vs $0.738. MiMo-V2.5-Pro (medium) ni ya haraka zaidi: 33.92s vs 44.65s, na pass rates 68.2% vs 66.7%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaMiMo-V2.5-Pro (medium)It has the best score here (6.9), while costing about 4.0x less than Qwen3.6 Flash (medium).

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-21

Kipimo Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash medium Toleo: 2026-04-20 MiMo-V2.5-Pro MiMo-V2.5-Pro medium Toleo: 2026-04-22
Alama 6.9 6.9
Nafasi #89 #88
Uaminifu 10.0 10.0
Uthabiti 8.2 8.2
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 68.2% 66.7%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 5 5
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 66
Gharama kwa matokeo 6.784 3.218
Jumla ya gharama $0.738 $0.187
Bei ya ingizo $0.188 / 1M $0.435 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $1.125 / 1M $0.870 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 129,041 139,883
Tokeni za matokeo 20,026 15,521
Tokeni za hoja 614,312 130,992
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 44.65s 33.92s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 578.13s 197.54s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 982.32s 746.19s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#89 Qwen3.6 Flash

medium
SVG batili
Gharama
$0.008
Muda
29.9s
Tokeni
6,784 tok

#88 MiMo-V2.5-Pro

medium
SVG batili
Gharama
$0.000
Muda
300.0s
Tokeni
0 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.0 5.1 44.5% 2 42.85s 7,895 495 67,967
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 6.2 4.7 66.7% 2 92.07s 6,543 780 51,218

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho