Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

Qwen3.6 27B inaongoza kwa average score: 5.5 vs 5.1. MiMo-V2.5 ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.025 vs $0.087. MiMo-V2.5 ni ya haraka zaidi: 4.62s vs 10.65s, na pass rates 45.5% vs 25.8%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaQwen3.6 27BIt has the strongest score in this comparison (5.5) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-21

Kipimo Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B none Toleo: 2026-04-20 MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 none Toleo: 2026-04-22
Alama 5.5 5.1
Nafasi #158 #174
Uaminifu 10.0 10.0
Uthabiti 7.6 9.6
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 45.5% 25.8%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 6 1
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 66
Gharama kwa matokeo 1.220 0.770
Jumla ya gharama $0.087 $0.025
Bei ya ingizo $0.450 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $2.700 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 95,796 141,043
Tokeni za matokeo 16,155 16,464
Tokeni za hoja 0 0
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 10.65s 4.62s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 156.31s 55.36s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 234.39s 101.57s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#158 Qwen3.6 27B

none
Gharama
$0.009
Muda
83.0s
Tokeni
4,549 tok

#174 MiMo-V2.5

none
Gharama
$0.007
Muda
267.4s
Tokeni
25,283 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
Qwen3.6 27B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.16s 7,913 539 0
MiMo-V2.5 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 3.24s 7,440 696 0

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho