Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

average score iko karibu sawa: 5.1 vs 5.1. Qwen3.5-9B ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.021 vs $0.025. MiMo-V2.5 ni ya haraka zaidi: 4.62s vs 19.17s, na pass rates 19.7% vs 25.8%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaMiMo-V2.5It has the best score here (5.1), while responding about 4.2x faster than Qwen3.5-9B.

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-22

Kipimo Qwen3.5-9B Qwen3.5-9B none Toleo: 2026-03-02 MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 none Toleo: 2026-04-22
Alama 5.1 5.1
Nafasi #177 #176
Uaminifu 10.0 10.0
Uthabiti 9.7 9.6
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 19.7% 25.8%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 1 1
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 66
Gharama kwa matokeo 0.490 0.770
Jumla ya gharama $0.021 $0.025
Bei ya ingizo $0.100 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $0.150 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 144,407 141,043
Tokeni za matokeo 37,484 16,464
Tokeni za hoja 0 0
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 19.17s 4.62s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 382.06s 55.36s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 421.74s 101.57s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#177 Qwen3.5-9B

none
SVG batili
Gharama
$0.000
Muda
300.0s
Tokeni
0 tok

#176 MiMo-V2.5

none
Gharama
$0.007
Muda
267.4s
Tokeni
25,283 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
Qwen3.5-9B 3.9 7.8 11.1% 1 5.60s 7,913 1,042 0
MiMo-V2.5 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 3.24s 7,440 696 0

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho