Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B vs Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash

GLM 4.7 Flash (medium) inaongoza kwa average score: 4.3 vs 3.8. Qwen3.5-9B (medium) ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.036 vs $0.166. Qwen3.5-9B (medium) ni ya haraka zaidi: 82.24s vs 142.59s, na pass rates 25.8% vs 31.8%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaGLM 4.7 Flash (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (4.3) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-25

Kipimo Qwen3.5-9B Qwen3.5-9B medium Toleo: 2026-03-02 GLM 4.7 Flash GLM 4.7 Flash medium Toleo: 2026-01-19
Alama 3.8 4.3
Nafasi #220 #210
Uaminifu 5.0 7.8
Uthabiti 8.1 7.0
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 25.8% 31.8%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 5 8
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 66
Gharama kwa matokeo 1.187 4.147
Jumla ya gharama $0.036 $0.166
Bei ya ingizo $0.100 / 1M $0.060 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $0.150 / 1M $0.400 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 17,070 79,051
Tokeni za matokeo 29,045 43,754
Tokeni za hoja 209,516 374,109
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 82.24s 142.59s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 226.38s 1539.97s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 1315.88s 1996.21s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#220 Qwen3.5-9B

medium
Gharama
$0.001
Muda
35.9s
Tokeni
3,030 tok

#210 GLM 4.7 Flash

medium
SVG batili
Gharama
$0.000
Muda
186.2s
Tokeni
12,112 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
Qwen3.5-9B 2.9 10.0 0.0% 0 100.88s 2,396 7,890 41,129
GLM 4.7 Flash 3.2 7.4 11.1% 1 55.33s 3,106 4,981 22,387

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho