Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1

average score iko karibu sawa: 7.1 vs 7.1. GLM 5.1 (medium) ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.535 vs $1.046. GLM 5.1 (medium) ni ya haraka zaidi: 46.77s vs 64.16s, na pass rates 71.2% vs 69.7%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaGLM 5.1 (medium)It has the best score here (7.1), while costing about 2.0x less than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (medium).

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-18

Kipimo Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium Toleo: 2026-02-24 GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 medium Toleo: 2026-04-07
Alama 7.1 7.1
Nafasi #71 #73
Uaminifu 10.0 8.3
Uthabiti 8.5 8.4
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 71.2% 69.7%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 4 4
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 66
Gharama kwa matokeo 8.509 4.202
Jumla ya gharama $1.046 $0.535
Bei ya ingizo $0.260 / 1M $0.966 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $2.080 / 1M $3.036 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 124,771 82,623
Tokeni za matokeo 44,077 16,089
Tokeni za hoja 443,141 136,463
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 64.16s 46.77s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 519.30s 308.75s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 1411.60s 982.16s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#71 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

medium
Gharama
$0.019
Muda
48.7s
Tokeni
6,034 tok

#73 GLM 5.1

medium
SVG batili
Gharama
$0.000
Muda
300.0s
Tokeni
0 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 6.0 7.2 55.6% 1 114.48s 7,630 8,057 82,578
GLM 5.1 4.6 3.7 44.5% 2 109.63s 5,702 4,871 37,826

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho