Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

average score iko karibu sawa: 6.6 vs 6.6. GLM 5.2 ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.151 vs $0.469. GLM 5.2 ni ya haraka zaidi: 9.34s vs 148.73s, na pass rates 53.0% vs 59.1%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaGLM 5.2It has the best score here (6.6), while costing about 3.1x less than LongCat 2.0 (high).

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-20

Kipimo LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 high Toleo: 2026-07-20 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 none Toleo: 2026-06-17
Alama 6.6 6.6
Nafasi #97 #96
Uaminifu 9.4 10.0
Uthabiti 8.2 9.2
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 53.0% 59.1%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 5 2
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 64
Gharama kwa matokeo 5.202 1.421
Jumla ya gharama $0.469 $0.151
Bei ya ingizo $0.300 / 1M $0.960 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $1.200 / 1M $3.014 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 93,357 112,359
Tokeni za matokeo 30,466 14,340
Tokeni za hoja 336,325 0
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 148.73s 9.34s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 941.66s 79.65s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 3272.00s 205.46s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#97 LongCat 2.0

high
SVG batili
Gharama
$0.000
Muda
600.0s
Tokeni
0 tok

#96 GLM 5.2

none
SVG batili
Gharama
$0.033
Muda
87.7s
Tokeni
7,455 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
LongCat 2.0 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 505.33s 6,913 244 192,377
GLM 5.2 3.7 9.5 0.0% 0 7.55s 7,263 1,958 0

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho