Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Qwen3.6 35B A3B (medium) inaongoza kwa average score: 6.7 vs 6.6. LongCat 2.0 (high) ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.469 vs $0.746. Qwen3.6 35B A3B (medium) ni ya haraka zaidi: 58.06s vs 148.73s, na pass rates 53.0% vs 60.6%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaQwen3.6 35B A3B (medium)It has the best score here (6.7), while responding about 2.6x faster than LongCat 2.0 (high).

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-21

Kipimo LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 high Toleo: 2026-07-20 Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B medium Toleo: 2026-04-20
Alama 6.6 6.7
Nafasi #102 #94
Uaminifu 9.4 10.0
Uthabiti 8.2 9.6
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 53.0% 60.6%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 5 1
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 66
Gharama kwa matokeo 5.202 5.712
Jumla ya gharama $0.469 $0.746
Bei ya ingizo $0.300 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $1.200 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 93,357 85,139
Tokeni za matokeo 30,466 61,819
Tokeni za hoja 336,325 678,766
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 148.73s 58.06s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 941.66s 817.57s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 3272.00s 1161.18s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#102 LongCat 2.0

high
SVG batili
Gharama
$0.000
Muda
600.0s
Tokeni
0 tok

#94 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

medium
SVG batili
Gharama
$0.000
Muda
300.0s
Tokeni
0 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
LongCat 2.0 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 505.33s 6,913 244 192,377
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 50.55s 5,051 7,929 37,223

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho