Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna

Muhtasari

average score iko karibu sawa: 7.5 vs 7.6. GPT-5.6 Luna (medium) ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.258 vs $0.275. GPT-5.6 Luna (medium) ni ya haraka zaidi: 6.70s vs 12.95s, na pass rates 65.1% vs 63.5%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaGPT-5.6 Luna (medium)It has the best score here (7.6), while responding about 1.9x faster than KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (medium).

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-14

Kipimo KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 medium Toleo: 2026-07-14 GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna medium Toleo: 2026-07-09
Alama 7.5 7.6
Nafasi #60 #57
Uaminifu 10.0 10.0
Uthabiti 7.7 9.6
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 65.1% 63.5%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 6 1
Jumla ya uendeshaji 63 63
Gharama kwa matokeo 2.498 1.978
Jumla ya gharama $0.275 $0.258
Bei ya ingizo $0.740 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $2.960 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 42,750 35,699
Tokeni za matokeo 2,098 2,148
Tokeni za hoja 80,027 34,740
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 12.95s 6.70s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 81.45s 29.85s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 271.92s 140.62s

Onyesho la kizazi

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#60 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5

medium
Gharama
$0.009
Muda
25.6s
Tokeni
2,939 tok

#57 GPT-5.6 Luna

medium
Gharama
$0.014
Muda
14.6s
Tokeni
2,362 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 7.8 10.0 66.7% 0 33.10s 7,893 416 33,658
GPT-5.6 Luna 5.4 7.2 44.4% 1 10.38s 7,302 564 9,928

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho