Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Ling 3.0 Flash vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6

Kimi K2.6 inaongoza kwa average score: 5.8 vs 5.7. Ling 3.0 Flash ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.000 vs $0.184. Ling 3.0 Flash ni ya haraka zaidi: 3.46s vs 19.58s, na pass rates 27.3% vs 34.9%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaKimi K2.6It has the strongest score in this comparison (5.8) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-24

Kipimo Ling 3.0 Flash Ling 3.0 Flash none Toleo: 2026-07-24 Inapatikana bure Kimi K2.6 Kimi K2.6 none Toleo: 2026-04-20
Alama 5.7 5.8
Nafasi #149 #145
Uaminifu 9.9 10.0
Uthabiti 10.0 9.3
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 27.3% 34.9%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 0 2
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 66
Gharama kwa matokeo 0.000 3.199
Jumla ya gharama $0.000 $0.184
Bei ya ingizo $0.000 / 1M $0.684 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $0.000 / 1M $3.420 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 124,176 116,970
Tokeni za matokeo 12,783 30,253
Tokeni za hoja 0 0
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 3.46s 19.58s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 17.51s 238.89s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 76.06s 430.85s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#149 Ling 3.0 Flash

none
Gharama
$0.000
Muda
11.6s
Tokeni
2,781 tok

#145 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6

none
Gharama
$0.020
Muda
127.4s
Tokeni
4,429 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
Ling 3.0 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 6.39s 8,307 639 0
Kimi K2.6 5.5 9.8 33.3% 0 82.57s 5,986 14,754 0

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho