Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B

average score iko karibu sawa: 5.6 vs 5.5. DeepSeek V4 Flash ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.044 vs $0.087. Qwen3.6 27B ni ya haraka zaidi: 10.65s vs 36.78s, na pass rates 31.8% vs 45.5%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaQwen3.6 27BIt has the best score here (5.5), while responding about 3.5x faster than DeepSeek V4 Flash.

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-22

Kipimo DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek V4 Flash none Toleo: 2026-04-24 Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B none Toleo: 2026-04-20
Alama 5.6 5.5
Nafasi #156 #158
Uaminifu 10.0 10.0
Uthabiti 8.5 7.6
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 31.8% 45.5%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 4 6
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 66
Gharama kwa matokeo 0.917 1.220
Jumla ya gharama $0.044 $0.087
Bei ya ingizo $0.098 / 1M $0.450 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $0.196 / 1M $2.700 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 240,221 95,796
Tokeni za matokeo 100,727 16,155
Tokeni za hoja 0 0
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 36.78s 10.65s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 247.27s 156.31s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 809.09s 234.39s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#156 DeepSeek V4 Flash

none
Gharama
$0.004
Muda
157.6s
Tokeni
11,297 tok

#158 Qwen3.6 27B

none
Gharama
$0.009
Muda
83.0s
Tokeni
4,549 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
DeepSeek V4 Flash 4.2 7.4 11.1% 1 17.13s 7,279 9,717 0
Qwen3.6 27B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.16s 7,913 539 0

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho