Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash

Ling 3.0 Flash inaongoza kwa average score: 5.7 vs 5.6. Ling 3.0 Flash ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.000 vs $0.044. Ling 3.0 Flash ni ya haraka zaidi: 3.46s vs 36.78s, na pass rates 31.8% vs 27.3%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaLing 3.0 FlashIt has the best score here (5.7), while responding about 10.6x faster than DeepSeek V4 Flash.

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-24

Kipimo DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek V4 Flash none Toleo: 2026-04-24 Ling 3.0 Flash Ling 3.0 Flash none Toleo: 2026-07-24 Inapatikana bure
Alama 5.6 5.7
Nafasi #158 #149
Uaminifu 10.0 9.9
Uthabiti 8.5 10.0
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 31.8% 27.3%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 4 0
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 66
Gharama kwa matokeo 0.917 0.000
Jumla ya gharama $0.044 $0.000
Bei ya ingizo $0.098 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $0.196 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 240,221 124,176
Tokeni za matokeo 100,727 12,783
Tokeni za hoja 0 0
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 36.78s 3.46s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 247.27s 17.51s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 809.09s 76.06s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#158 DeepSeek V4 Flash

none
Gharama
$0.004
Muda
157.6s
Tokeni
11,297 tok

#149 Ling 3.0 Flash

none
Gharama
$0.000
Muda
11.6s
Tokeni
2,781 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
DeepSeek V4 Flash 4.2 7.4 11.1% 1 17.13s 7,279 9,717 0
Ling 3.0 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 6.39s 8,307 639 0

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho