Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

Muhtasari

Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) inaongoza kwa average score: 8.7 vs 8.0. GLM 5.2 (high) ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.667 vs $0.679. Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) ni ya haraka zaidi: 4.73s vs 37.09s, na pass rates 82.5% vs 77.8%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaClaude Opus 4.7 (medium)It has the best score here (8.7), while responding about 7.8x faster than GLM 5.2 (high).

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-14

Kipimo Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 medium Toleo: 2026-04-16 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 high Toleo: 2026-06-17
Alama 8.7 8.0
Nafasi #16 #32
Uaminifu 10.0 9.3
Uthabiti 9.6 7.6
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 82.5% 77.8%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 1 6
Jumla ya uendeshaji 63 63
Gharama kwa matokeo 3.991 4.255
Jumla ya gharama $0.679 $0.667
Bei ya ingizo $5.000 / 1M $0.929 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $25.000 / 1M $2.918 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 65,406 34,993
Tokeni za matokeo 11,858 51,575
Tokeni za hoja 2,198 166,065
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 4.73s 37.09s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 23.18s 180.69s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 94.51s 778.91s

Onyesho la kizazi

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#16 Claude Opus 4.7

medium
Gharama
$0.059
Muda
26.8s
Tokeni
2,475 tok

#32 GLM 5.2

high
SVG batili
Gharama
$0.000
Muda
300.0s
Tokeni
0 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
Claude Opus 4.7 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 12.96s 10,635 7,629 1,114
GLM 5.2 6.4 4.4 77.8% 2 73.03s 5,124 2,302 22,546

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho