AI BENCHY
Compară Grafice Metodologie
❤️ Made by XCS
Your ad here

Eșecuri AI BENCHY

Eșecuri Răspuns greșit

Vezi ce modele AI se lovesc cel mai des de Răspuns greșit, ca să identifici riscurile de fiabilitate înainte să alegi. Sortează după: Teste corecte ↑.

Modele afișate

54

Eșecuri totale

275

Modelul cel mai afectat

LFM2-24B-A2B 9
Rang Model Companie Număr de Răspuns greșit Scor mediu Teste corecte Timp de răspuns (mediu)
#55 LFM2-24B-A2B none Liquid 9 2.6 1/16 811ms
#50 Qwen3 Coder Next medium Qwen 8 3.5 3/16 12.5s
#53 Grok 4.1 Fast none X AI 11 2.9 3/16 1.90s
#54 MiMo-V2-Flash none Xiaomi 10 2.9 3/16 2.97s
#47 GPT-4o-mini none OpenAI 11 4.0 4/16 2.07s
#48 Qwen3 Coder Next none Qwen 10 4.0 4/16 11.7s
#49 GLM 4.7 Flash none Z.ai 9 3.9 4/16 2.99s
#51 Mercury 2 none Inception 11 3.4 4/16 596ms
#52 GLM 4.7 Flash medium Z.ai 7 3.1 4/16 36.8s
#41 Qwen3.5-27B none Qwen 9 4.9 5/16 1.75s
#43 MiniMax M2.5 medium Minimax 5 4.7 5/16 43.0s
#45 Trinity Large Preview none Arcee AI 9 4.2 5/16 3.15s
#46 Kimi K2.5 none Moonshot AI 11 4.1 5/16 11.9s
#38 Gemini 2.5 Flash none Google 9 5.2 6/16 923ms
#40 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none Qwen 9 5.0 6/16 3.72s
#42 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none Qwen 8 4.7 6/16 4.10s
#44 GPT-5.4 none OpenAI 9 4.5 6/16 1.48s
#33 DeepSeek V3.2 none DeepSeek 6 5.5 7/16 12.9s
#34 GPT-5 Nano medium OpenAI 5 5.5 7/16 47.9s
#36 Mercury 2 medium Inception 5 5.3 7/16 2.36s
#37 Qwen3.5-Flash none Qwen 8 5.2 7/16 3.54s
#39 gpt-oss-120b medium OpenAI 5 5.1 7/16 16.7s
#32 GPT-5 Mini medium OpenAI 3 6.0 8/16 25.1s
#35 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Qwen 2 5.5 8/16 43.9s
#28 Kimi K2.5 medium Moonshot AI 3 6.4 9/16 69.8s
#29 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none Qwen 7 6.2 9/16 2.65s
#30 Grok 4.1 Fast medium X AI 2 6.2 9/16 26.3s
#31 GLM 5 none Z.ai 7 6.0 9/16 4.03s
#13 Step 3.5 Flash medium Stepfun 3 7.4 10/16 29.1s
#19 GPT-5.3 Chat none OpenAI 4 7.3 10/16 5.96s
#22 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none Google 4 7.1 10/16 1.33s
#23 Seed-2.0-Mini medium Bytedance Seed 1 6.9 10/16 65.1s
#24 Qwen3.5-Flash medium Qwen 1 6.9 10/16 70.8s
#25 Claude Sonnet 4.6 none Anthropic 2 6.8 10/16 5.57s
#26 Claude Opus 4.6 medium Anthropic 2 6.6 10/16 22.9s
#27 GPT-5.2 medium OpenAI 1 6.5 10/16 15.3s
#12 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview medium Google 4 7.5 11/16 3.83s
#14 GLM 5 medium Z.ai 2 7.4 11/16 16.2s
#15 GPT-5.2 Chat none OpenAI 4 7.4 11/16 7.03s
#16 Gemini 2.5 Flash medium Google 4 7.4 11/16 12.4s
#17 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low Google 4 7.3 11/16 3.36s
#18 DeepSeek V3.2 medium DeepSeek 3 7.3 11/16 39.5s
#20 Gemini 3 Flash Preview none Google 5 7.2 11/16 1.75s
#21 MiMo-V2-Flash medium Xiaomi 3 7.2 11/16 25.3s
#3 GPT-5.3-Codex medium OpenAI 2 8.4 12/16 16.6s
#7 Qwen3.5-27B medium Qwen 1 8.2 12/16 52.1s
#8 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high Google 3 8.2 12/16 68.8s
#9 GPT-5.4 medium OpenAI 2 8.0 12/16 20.1s
#10 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium Qwen 3 7.7 12/16 29.7s
#11 Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium Anthropic 1 7.7 12/16 11.2s
#4 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium Qwen 1 8.3 13/16 34.5s
#5 Gemini 3 Flash Preview low Google 3 8.2 13/16 6.11s
#6 Gemini 3 Pro Preview medium Google 3 8.2 13/16 7.15s
#2 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium Google 1 9.4 15/16 16.6s

Top modele după Număr de Răspuns greșit

Număr de Răspuns greșit vs scor mediu

Top modele după Timp de răspuns (mediu)