Categorie AI BENCHY
Clasament Specific domeniului
Vezi ce modele AI se descurcă cel mai bine la Specific domeniului, care rămân fiabile și unde apar cele mai mari diferențe. Sortează după: Timp de răspuns (mediu) ↓.
| Rang | Model | Companie | Scor Specific domeniului | Scor | Teste corecte | Timp de răspuns (mediu) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #71 | MiniMax M2.5 medium | Minimax | 2.9 | 5.7 | 0/3 | 237.3s |
| #57 | GPT-5 Nano medium | OpenAI | 5.2 | 6.3 | 1/3 | 204.0s |
| #34 | Kimi K2.6 medium | Moonshot AI | 5.3 | 7.7 | 1/3 | 202.4s |
| #93 | GLM 4.7 Flash medium | Z.ai | 3.5 | 4.6 | 0/3 | 174.6s |
| #30 | Step 3.5 Flash medium | Stepfun | 5.3 | 7.9 | 1/3 | 170.5s |
| #32 | Qwen3.5-Flash medium | Qwen | 5.3 | 7.8 | 1/3 | 146.5s |
| #97 | Qwen3.5-9B medium | Qwen | 3.6 | 4.4 | 0/3 | 137.7s |
| #46 | Kimi K2.5 medium | Moonshot AI | 3.5 | 7.0 | 0/3 | 137.3s |
| #11 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high | 5.3 | 8.4 | 1/3 | 127.6s | |
| #52 | Grok 4.1 Fast medium | X AI | 5.8 | 6.7 | 1/3 | 121.8s |
| #41 | MiMo-V2-Flash medium | Xiaomi | 5.9 | 7.5 | 1/3 | 96.0s |
| #6 | Seed-2.0-Lite medium | Bytedance Seed | 5.9 | 8.6 | 1/3 | 88.7s |
| #43 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium | Qwen | 4.1 | 7.4 | 0/3 | 88.3s |
| #37 | Claude Opus 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 3.0 | 7.6 | 0/3 | 83.4s |
| #10 | Qwen3.5-27B medium | Qwen | 5.3 | 8.4 | 1/3 | 79.5s |