Categorie AI BENCHY
Clasament Specific domeniului
Vezi ce modele AI se descurcă cel mai bine la Specific domeniului, care rămân fiabile și unde apar cele mai mari diferențe. Sortează după: Timp de răspuns (mediu) ↓.
| Rang | Model | Companie | Scor Specific domeniului | Scor | Teste corecte | Timp de răspuns (mediu) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #129 | MiniMax M2.5 medium | Minimax | 2.9 | 5.3 | 0/3 | 237.3s |
| #67 | MiniMax M3 medium | Minimax | 5.5 | 7.1 | 1/3 | 233.1s |
| #103 | DeepSeek V4 Pro high | DeepSeek | 2.9 | 6.0 | 0/3 | 205.7s |
| #94 | GPT-5 Nano medium | OpenAI | 5.2 | 6.3 | 1/3 | 204.0s |
| #60 | Kimi K2.6 medium | Moonshot AI | 5.3 | 7.2 | 1/3 | 202.4s |
| #38 | Grok 4.3 medium | X AI | 5.3 | 7.6 | 1/3 | 181.7s |
| #158 | GLM 4.7 Flash medium | Z.ai | 3.5 | 4.4 | 0/3 | 174.6s |
| #62 | Step 3.5 Flash medium | Stepfun | 5.3 | 7.2 | 1/3 | 170.5s |
| #9 | GPT-5.5 medium | OpenAI | 5.3 | 8.8 | 1/3 | 164.1s |
| #47 | Grok Build 0.1 medium | X AI | 5.3 | 7.4 | 1/3 | 158.0s |
| #71 | Step 3.7 Flash high | Stepfun | 4.1 | 7.0 | 0/3 | 149.6s |
| #49 | Qwen3.5-Flash medium | Qwen | 5.3 | 7.4 | 1/3 | 146.5s |
| #53 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite high | 3.6 | 7.3 | 0/3 | 139.9s | |
| #161 | Qwen3.5-9B medium | Qwen | 3.6 | 4.2 | 0/3 | 137.7s |
| #76 | Kimi K2.5 medium | Moonshot AI | 3.5 | 6.8 | 0/3 | 137.3s |