AI BENCHY
Compară Grafice Metodologie
❤️ Made by XCS
Your ad here

Categorie AI BENCHY

Clasament Specific domeniului

Vezi ce modele AI se descurcă cel mai bine la Specific domeniului, care rămân fiabile și unde apar cele mai mari diferențe. Sortează după: Timp de răspuns (mediu) ↓.

Modele afișate

55

Media pentru Scor Specific domeniului

6.4

Cel mai bun model

MiniMax M2.5 10.0
Rang Model Companie Scor Specific domeniului Scor mediu Teste corecte Timp de răspuns (mediu)
#43 MiniMax M2.5 medium Minimax 10.0 4.7 0/3 237.3s
#34 GPT-5 Nano medium OpenAI 4.0 5.5 1/3 204.0s
#52 GLM 4.7 Flash medium Z.ai 10.0 3.1 0/3 174.6s
#13 Step 3.5 Flash medium Stepfun 4.0 7.4 1/3 170.5s
#24 Qwen3.5-Flash medium Qwen 4.0 6.9 1/3 146.5s
#28 Kimi K2.5 medium Moonshot AI 10.0 6.4 0/3 137.3s
#8 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high Google 4.0 8.2 1/3 127.6s
#30 Grok 4.1 Fast medium X AI 4.0 6.2 1/3 121.8s
#21 MiMo-V2-Flash medium Xiaomi 4.0 7.2 1/3 96.0s
#35 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Qwen 10.0 5.5 0/3 88.3s
#26 Claude Opus 4.6 medium Anthropic 10.0 6.6 0/3 83.4s
#7 Qwen3.5-27B medium Qwen 4.0 8.2 1/3 79.5s
#27 GPT-5.2 medium OpenAI 4.0 6.5 1/3 77.8s
#9 GPT-5.4 medium OpenAI 4.0 8.0 1/3 74.3s
#3 GPT-5.3-Codex medium OpenAI 4.0 8.4 1/3 64.3s
#10 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium Qwen 10.0 7.7 0/3 63.4s
#39 gpt-oss-120b medium OpenAI 10.0 5.1 0/3 50.9s
#32 GPT-5 Mini medium OpenAI 10.0 6.0 0/3 44.6s
#18 DeepSeek V3.2 medium DeepSeek 4.0 7.3 1/3 39.3s
#16 Gemini 2.5 Flash medium Google 4.0 7.4 1/3 37.3s
#2 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium Google 7.0 9.4 2/3 32.7s
#1 Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium Google 10.0 10.0 3/3 21.1s
#15 GPT-5.2 Chat none OpenAI 4.0 7.4 1/3 17.8s
#4 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium Qwen 4.0 8.3 1/3 17.5s
#19 GPT-5.3 Chat none OpenAI 10.0 7.3 0/3 13.0s
#5 Gemini 3 Flash Preview low Google 4.0 8.2 1/3 8.05s
#6 Gemini 3 Pro Preview medium Google 4.0 8.2 1/3 7.01s
#36 Mercury 2 medium Inception 10.0 5.3 0/3 6.48s
#46 Kimi K2.5 none Moonshot AI 4.0 4.1 1/3 4.38s
#12 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview medium Google 10.0 7.5 0/3 4.21s
#25 Claude Sonnet 4.6 none Anthropic 7.0 6.8 2/3 3.54s
#17 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low Google 4.0 7.3 1/3 2.36s
#31 GLM 5 none Z.ai 10.0 6.0 0/3 2.24s
#33 DeepSeek V3.2 none DeepSeek 10.0 5.5 0/3 1.61s
#29 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none Qwen 4.0 6.2 1/3 1.17s
#44 GPT-5.4 none OpenAI 4.0 4.5 1/3 1.07s
#53 Grok 4.1 Fast none X AI 4.0 2.9 1/3 1.06s
#20 Gemini 3 Flash Preview none Google 7.0 7.2 2/3 963ms
#48 Qwen3 Coder Next none Qwen 4.0 4.0 1/3 962ms
#22 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none Google 4.0 7.1 1/3 942ms
#37 Qwen3.5-Flash none Qwen 7.0 5.2 2/3 905ms
#45 Trinity Large Preview none Arcee AI 4.0 4.2 1/3 877ms
#49 GLM 4.7 Flash none Z.ai 7.0 3.9 2/3 744ms
#50 Qwen3 Coder Next medium Qwen 4.0 3.5 1/3 638ms
#47 GPT-4o-mini none OpenAI 10.0 4.0 0/3 637ms
#54 MiMo-V2-Flash none Xiaomi 4.0 2.9 1/3 564ms
#41 Qwen3.5-27B none Qwen 10.0 4.9 0/3 540ms
#51 Mercury 2 none Inception 4.0 3.4 1/3 534ms
#38 Gemini 2.5 Flash none Google 4.0 5.2 1/3 495ms
#42 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none Qwen 7.0 4.7 2/3 485ms
#40 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none Qwen 4.0 5.0 1/3 465ms
#55 LFM2-24B-A2B none Liquid 4.0 2.6 1/3 287ms
#11 Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium Anthropic 10.0 7.7 0/3 0ms
#14 GLM 5 medium Z.ai 10.0 7.4 0/3 0ms
#23 Seed-2.0-Mini medium Bytedance Seed 10.0 6.9 0/3 0ms

Top modele după Scor Specific domeniului

Scor Specific domeniului vs cost total

Top modele după Timp de răspuns (mediu)