Categorie AI BENCHY
Clasament Specific domeniului
Vezi ce modele AI se descurcă cel mai bine la Specific domeniului, care rămân fiabile și unde apar cele mai mari diferențe. Sortează după: Timp de răspuns (mediu) ↓.
| Rang | Model | Companie | Scor Specific domeniului | Scor | Teste corecte | Timp de răspuns (mediu) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #75 | GLM 5.1 none | Z.ai | 2.9 | 5.6 | 0/3 | 1.99s |
| #77 | GLM 5 Turbo none | Z.ai | 5.3 | 5.5 | 1/3 | 1.97s |
| #65 | MiMo-V2-Pro none | Xiaomi | 5.3 | 6.0 | 1/3 | 1.78s |
| #64 | DeepSeek V3.2 none | DeepSeek | 3.6 | 6.1 | 0/3 | 1.61s |
| #69 | Kimi K2.6 none | Moonshot AI | 5.3 | 5.8 | 1/3 | 1.48s |
| #61 | Seed-2.0-Lite none | Bytedance Seed | 3.6 | 6.2 | 0/3 | 1.33s |
| #4 | Claude Opus 4.7 none | Anthropic | 7.7 | 9.2 | 2/3 | 1.19s |
| #3 | Claude Opus 4.7 medium | Anthropic | 7.7 | 9.2 | 2/3 | 1.17s |
| #49 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none | Qwen | 5.3 | 6.8 | 1/3 | 1.17s |
| #55 | MiMo-V2-Omni none | Xiaomi | 5.3 | 6.5 | 1/3 | 1.14s |
| #66 | GPT-5.4 none | OpenAI | 5.3 | 5.9 | 1/3 | 1.07s |
| #95 | Grok 4.1 Fast none | X AI | 5.9 | 4.5 | 1/3 | 1.06s |
| #21 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview none | 7.7 | 8.1 | 2/3 | 963ms | |
| #87 | Qwen3 Coder Next none | Qwen | 5.3 | 5.1 | 1/3 | 962ms |
| #29 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none | 5.3 | 7.9 | 1/3 | 942ms |