Clasament Specific domeniului
Vezi ce modele AI se descurcă cel mai bine la Specific domeniului, care rămân fiabile și unde apar cele mai mari diferențe. Sortează după: Teste corecte ↓.
316/316
Filtrează modelele
Niciun model nu corespunde căutării și filtrelor curente.
| Rang | Model | Companie | Scor Specific domeniului | Scor | Cost total | Teste corecte | Timp de răspuns (mediu) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #68 | GLM 5.2 high | Z.ai | 3.1 | 8.0 | $1.188 | 0/3 | 126.8s |
| #72 | GPT-5.2 Chat none | OpenAI | 3.0 | 7.9 | $0.594 | 0/3 | 23.7s |
| #75 | Qwen3.7 Plus medium | Qwen | 3.6 | 7.9 | $0.277 | 0/3 | 60.1s |
| #76 | Qwen3.6 Plus medium | Qwen | 2.9 | 7.8 | $0.418 | 0/3 | 46.4s |
| #77 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite medium | 4.1 | 7.8 | $0.272 | 0/3 | 5.34s | |
| #78 | GLM 5.2 medium | Z.ai | 4.1 | 7.8 | $0.224 | 0/3 | 45.5s |
| #80 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 3.0 | 7.8 | $2.126 | 0/3 | 58.4s |
| #82 | Seed-2.0-Lite medium | Bytedance Seed | 3.6 | 7.8 | $0.236 | 0/3 | 84.4s |
| #84 | Qwen3.7 Flash high | Qwen | 2.9 | 7.8 | $0.052 | 0/3 | 34.4s |
| #85 | GLM 5 medium | Z.ai | 3.5 | 7.7 | $0.228 | 0/3 | 0ms |
| #86 | Seed-2.0-Code low | Bytedance Seed | 4.1 | 7.7 | $0.767 | 0/3 | 238.4s |
| #87 | Claude Opus 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 3.0 | 7.7 | $2.961 | 0/3 | 42.5s |
| #88 | DeepSeek V4 Pro high | DeepSeek | 3.6 | 7.7 | $0.476 | 0/3 | 249.5s |
| #89 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 high | DeepSeek | 3.6 | 7.6 | $0.042 | 0/3 | 115.4s |
| #90 | GLM 5 Turbo medium | Z.ai | 2.9 | 7.6 | $0.323 | 0/3 | 71.1s |