AI BENCHY
Compară Grafice Metodologie
❤️ Made by XCS
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Categorie AI BENCHY

Clasament Specific domeniului

Vezi ce modele AI se descurcă cel mai bine la Specific domeniului, care rămân fiabile și unde apar cele mai mari diferențe. Sortează după: Teste corecte ↑.

Modele afișate

55

Media pentru Scor Specific domeniului

6.4

Cel mai bun model

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 10.0
Rang Model Companie Scor Specific domeniului Scor mediu Teste corecte Timp de răspuns (mediu)
#10 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium Qwen 10.0 7.7 0/3 63.4s
#11 Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium Anthropic 10.0 7.7 0/3 0ms
#12 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview medium Google 10.0 7.5 0/3 4.21s
#14 GLM 5 medium Z.ai 10.0 7.4 0/3 0ms
#19 GPT-5.3 Chat none OpenAI 10.0 7.3 0/3 13.0s
#23 Seed-2.0-Mini medium Bytedance Seed 10.0 6.9 0/3 0ms
#26 Claude Opus 4.6 medium Anthropic 10.0 6.6 0/3 83.4s
#28 Kimi K2.5 medium Moonshot AI 10.0 6.4 0/3 137.3s
#31 GLM 5 none Z.ai 10.0 6.0 0/3 2.24s
#32 GPT-5 Mini medium OpenAI 10.0 6.0 0/3 44.6s
#33 DeepSeek V3.2 none DeepSeek 10.0 5.5 0/3 1.61s
#35 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Qwen 10.0 5.5 0/3 88.3s
#36 Mercury 2 medium Inception 10.0 5.3 0/3 6.48s
#39 gpt-oss-120b medium OpenAI 10.0 5.1 0/3 50.9s
#41 Qwen3.5-27B none Qwen 10.0 4.9 0/3 540ms
#43 MiniMax M2.5 medium Minimax 10.0 4.7 0/3 237.3s
#47 GPT-4o-mini none OpenAI 10.0 4.0 0/3 637ms
#52 GLM 4.7 Flash medium Z.ai 10.0 3.1 0/3 174.6s
#3 GPT-5.3-Codex medium OpenAI 4.0 8.4 1/3 64.3s
#4 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium Qwen 4.0 8.3 1/3 17.5s
#5 Gemini 3 Flash Preview low Google 4.0 8.2 1/3 8.05s
#6 Gemini 3 Pro Preview medium Google 4.0 8.2 1/3 7.01s
#7 Qwen3.5-27B medium Qwen 4.0 8.2 1/3 79.5s
#8 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high Google 4.0 8.2 1/3 127.6s
#9 GPT-5.4 medium OpenAI 4.0 8.0 1/3 74.3s
#13 Step 3.5 Flash medium Stepfun 4.0 7.4 1/3 170.5s
#15 GPT-5.2 Chat none OpenAI 4.0 7.4 1/3 17.8s
#16 Gemini 2.5 Flash medium Google 4.0 7.4 1/3 37.3s
#17 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low Google 4.0 7.3 1/3 2.36s
#18 DeepSeek V3.2 medium DeepSeek 4.0 7.3 1/3 39.3s
#21 MiMo-V2-Flash medium Xiaomi 4.0 7.2 1/3 96.0s
#22 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none Google 4.0 7.1 1/3 942ms
#24 Qwen3.5-Flash medium Qwen 4.0 6.9 1/3 146.5s
#27 GPT-5.2 medium OpenAI 4.0 6.5 1/3 77.8s
#29 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none Qwen 4.0 6.2 1/3 1.17s
#30 Grok 4.1 Fast medium X AI 4.0 6.2 1/3 121.8s
#34 GPT-5 Nano medium OpenAI 4.0 5.5 1/3 204.0s
#38 Gemini 2.5 Flash none Google 4.0 5.2 1/3 495ms
#40 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none Qwen 4.0 5.0 1/3 465ms
#44 GPT-5.4 none OpenAI 4.0 4.5 1/3 1.07s
#45 Trinity Large Preview none Arcee AI 4.0 4.2 1/3 877ms
#46 Kimi K2.5 none Moonshot AI 4.0 4.1 1/3 4.38s
#48 Qwen3 Coder Next none Qwen 4.0 4.0 1/3 962ms
#50 Qwen3 Coder Next medium Qwen 4.0 3.5 1/3 638ms
#51 Mercury 2 none Inception 4.0 3.4 1/3 534ms
#53 Grok 4.1 Fast none X AI 4.0 2.9 1/3 1.06s
#54 MiMo-V2-Flash none Xiaomi 4.0 2.9 1/3 564ms
#55 LFM2-24B-A2B none Liquid 4.0 2.6 1/3 287ms
#2 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium Google 7.0 9.4 2/3 32.7s
#20 Gemini 3 Flash Preview none Google 7.0 7.2 2/3 963ms
#25 Claude Sonnet 4.6 none Anthropic 7.0 6.8 2/3 3.54s
#37 Qwen3.5-Flash none Qwen 7.0 5.2 2/3 905ms
#42 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none Qwen 7.0 4.7 2/3 485ms
#49 GLM 4.7 Flash none Z.ai 7.0 3.9 2/3 744ms
#1 Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium Google 10.0 10.0 3/3 21.1s

Top modele după Scor Specific domeniului

Scor Specific domeniului vs cost total

Top modele după Timp de răspuns (mediu)