Categorie AI BENCHY
Clasament Specific domeniului
Vezi ce modele AI se descurcă cel mai bine la Specific domeniului, care rămân fiabile și unde apar cele mai mari diferențe. Sortează după: Timp de răspuns (mediu) ↑.
| Rang | Model | Companie | Scor Specific domeniului | Scor | Teste corecte | Timp de răspuns (mediu) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #68 | gpt-oss-120b medium | OpenAI | 2.9 | 5.8 | 0/3 | 50.9s |
| #35 | MiMo-V2-Omni medium | Xiaomi | 3.0 | 7.7 | 0/3 | 55.1s |
| #19 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium | Qwen | 2.9 | 8.1 | 0/3 | 63.4s |
| #7 | GPT-5.3-Codex medium | OpenAI | 5.9 | 8.6 | 1/3 | 64.3s |
| #44 | GPT-5.4 Mini medium | OpenAI | 4.1 | 7.3 | 0/3 | 65.3s |
| #18 | GLM 5 Turbo medium | Z.ai | 2.9 | 8.1 | 0/3 | 71.1s |
| #16 | GPT-5.4 medium | OpenAI | 5.3 | 8.2 | 1/3 | 74.3s |
| #40 | GPT-5.2 medium | OpenAI | 5.9 | 7.5 | 1/3 | 77.8s |
| #10 | Qwen3.5-27B medium | Qwen | 5.3 | 8.4 | 1/3 | 79.5s |
| #37 | Claude Opus 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 3.0 | 7.6 | 0/3 | 83.4s |
| #43 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium | Qwen | 4.1 | 7.4 | 0/3 | 88.3s |
| #6 | Seed-2.0-Lite medium | Bytedance Seed | 5.9 | 8.6 | 1/3 | 88.7s |
| #41 | MiMo-V2-Flash medium | Xiaomi | 5.9 | 7.5 | 1/3 | 96.0s |
| #52 | Grok 4.1 Fast medium | X AI | 5.8 | 6.7 | 1/3 | 121.8s |
| #11 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high | 5.3 | 8.4 | 1/3 | 127.6s |