Categorie AI BENCHY
Clasament Specific domeniului
Vezi ce modele AI se descurcă cel mai bine la Specific domeniului, care rămân fiabile și unde apar cele mai mari diferențe. Sortează după: Timp de răspuns (mediu) ↑.
| Rang | Model | Companie | Scor Specific domeniului | Scor | Teste corecte | Timp de răspuns (mediu) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #82 | Grok 4.20 none | X AI | 3.0 | 5.2 | 0/3 | 687ms |
| #74 | GLM 4.7 Flash none | Z.ai | 7.7 | 5.6 | 2/3 | 744ms |
| #78 | Trinity Large Preview none | Arcee AI | 5.3 | 5.3 | 1/3 | 877ms |
| #59 | Qwen3.5-Flash none | Qwen | 7.7 | 6.2 | 2/3 | 905ms |
| #81 | Elephant medium | Openrouter | 3.0 | 5.2 | 0/3 | 925ms |
| #96 | GPT-5.4 Nano none | OpenAI | 2.9 | 4.5 | 0/3 | 926ms |
| #85 | Elephant none | Openrouter | 3.0 | 5.2 | 0/3 | 927ms |
| #86 | GPT-5.4 Mini none | OpenAI | 3.5 | 5.1 | 0/3 | 937ms |
| #29 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none | 5.3 | 7.9 | 1/3 | 942ms | |
| #87 | Qwen3 Coder Next none | Qwen | 5.3 | 5.1 | 1/3 | 962ms |
| #21 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview none | 7.7 | 8.1 | 2/3 | 963ms | |
| #95 | Grok 4.1 Fast none | X AI | 5.9 | 4.5 | 1/3 | 1.06s |
| #66 | GPT-5.4 none | OpenAI | 5.3 | 5.9 | 1/3 | 1.07s |
| #55 | MiMo-V2-Omni none | Xiaomi | 5.3 | 6.5 | 1/3 | 1.14s |
| #49 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none | Qwen | 5.3 | 6.8 | 1/3 | 1.17s |