Categorie AI BENCHY
Clasament Combinat
Vezi ce modele AI se descurcă cel mai bine la Combinat, care rămân fiabile și unde apar cele mai mari diferențe. Sortează după: Teste corecte ↑.
| Rang | Model | Companie | Scor Combinat | Scor | Teste corecte | Timp de răspuns (mediu) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #27 | DeepSeek V3.2 medium | DeepSeek | 10.0 | 8.0 | 1/1 | 93.1s |
| #28 | GPT-5.2 Chat none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.9 | 1/1 | 9.12s |
| #30 | Step 3.5 Flash medium | Stepfun | 10.0 | 7.9 | 1/1 | 29.6s |
| #32 | Qwen3.5-Flash medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.8 | 1/1 | 17.8s |
| #33 | GLM 5.1 medium | Z.ai | 9.5 | 7.8 | 1/1 | 43.1s |
| #34 | Kimi K2.6 medium | Moonshot AI | 10.0 | 7.7 | 1/1 | 41.0s |
| #35 | MiMo-V2-Omni medium | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 7.7 | 1/1 | 19.3s |
| #36 | GPT-5.3 Chat none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.7 | 1/1 | 12.0s |
| #37 | Claude Opus 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 7.6 | 1/1 | 76.7s |
| #38 | GPT-5.4 Nano medium | OpenAI | 9.8 | 7.6 | 1/1 | 24.1s |
| #39 | Seed-2.0-Mini medium | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 7.5 | 1/1 | 262.8s |
| #40 | GPT-5.2 medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.5 | 1/1 | 14.1s |
| #41 | MiMo-V2-Flash medium | Xiaomi | 9.8 | 7.5 | 1/1 | 75.7s |
| #42 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 none | Anthropic | 9.5 | 7.4 | 1/1 | 23.8s |
| #44 | GPT-5.4 Mini medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.3 | 1/1 | 17.8s |