Categorie AI BENCHY
Clasament Programare
Vezi ce modele AI se descurcă cel mai bine la Programare, care rămân fiabile și unde apar cele mai mari diferențe.
| Rang | Model | Companie | Scor Programare | Scor | Teste corecte | Timp de răspuns (mediu) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium | 10.0 | 10.0 | 1/1 | 79.7s | |
| #2 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium | 10.0 | 9.6 | 1/1 | 19.9s | |
| #3 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview low | 10.0 | 8.8 | 1/1 | 6.94s | |
| #4 | Seed-2.0-Lite medium | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 8.6 | 1/1 | 74.5s |
| #5 | GPT-5.3-Codex medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.6 | 1/1 | 8.95s |
| #6 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.5 | 1/1 | 120.9s |
| #8 | Qwen3.5-27B medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.4 | 1/1 | 70.4s |
| #11 | GLM 5 medium | Z.ai | 10.0 | 8.4 | 1/1 | 79.1s |
| #13 | Gemini 2.5 Flash medium | 10.0 | 8.2 | 1/1 | 16.2s | |
| #14 | GPT-5.4 medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.2 | 1/1 | 13.0s |
| #15 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview medium | 10.0 | 8.2 | 1/1 | 4.34s | |
| #16 | GLM 5 Turbo medium | Z.ai | 10.0 | 8.1 | 1/1 | 12.3s |
| #19 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview none | 10.0 | 8.1 | 1/1 | 1.59s | |
| #20 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low | 10.0 | 8.1 | 1/1 | 2.20s | |
| #21 | MiMo-V2-Pro medium | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 8.1 | 1/1 | 52.1s |