#98 GLM 5V Turbo
none- Cost
- $0.042
- Time
- 177.3s
- Tokens
- 10,434 tok
Z.ai
Release: 2026-04-01
Tested on: 2026-05-21 23:41
z-ai/glm-5v-turbo::none
~106B total (~12B active)MoEClosedEstimated
(medium)
(none)
Summary
GLM 5V Turbo scores 5.9 on AI BENCHY and ranks #98. It has 10.0 reliability, a 40.0% pass rate, $0.049 total cost, and 3.02s average response time.
What makes GLM 5V Turbo unique: It stands out most in Domain specific, where it ranks #3, while Puzzle Solving is its weakest area at #18. Its total benchmark cost is unusually low for its score range. It is notably fast compared with similar models.
Archived model: this model is no longer updated or tested on new tests.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- ~106B total (~12B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Closed
- License
- -
Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Vendor does not disclose the count.
5.9
Consistency
10.0
10.0
$0.049
Total Output Tokens
1,757
Total Input Tokens
0
Input Price
$1.200 / 1M
Output Price
$4.000 / 1M
Flaky tests
0
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 13:05 Re-test | 5.6 | 10.0 | $0.052 | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:05 Re-test | 5.6 | 10.0 | $0.052 | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:05 New test added | 5.8 | 10.0 | $0.052 | Compare | |
| 2026-05-21 23:41 Suite changed | 5.9 | 10.0 | $0.049 | Current run | |
| 2026-04-11 01:19 First recorded run | 6.2 | N/A | $0.044 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-21 23:41 · Suite changed | 60/60 attempts | 5.9 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 8/20 | 0 | 1,757 | 0 | $0.049 | 3.02s |
| 2026-04-11 01:19 · First recorded run | 54/54 attempts | 6.2 | 10.0 | N/A | 8/18 | 0 | 1,724 | 0 | $0.044 | 3.10s |
| Difference | — | -0.3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | +33 | 0 | +$0.006 | -87ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 60/60 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 54/54 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 4.8 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 6.8 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 5.3 | 10.0 | |
| General Intelligence | 4.6 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 6.5 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 5.3 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |