#83 GLM 5 Turbo
none- Cost
- $0.047
- Time
- 129.2s
- Tokens
- 11,775 tok
Z.ai
Release: 2026-03-15
Tested on: 2026-04-11 01:19
z-ai/glm-5-turbo::none
744B total (40B active)MoEClosed
(medium)
(none)
Summary
GLM 5 Turbo scores 5.5 on AI BENCHY and ranks #83. It has N/A reliability, a 37.0% pass rate, $0.032 total cost, and 2.94s average response time.
What makes GLM 5 Turbo unique: Its total benchmark cost is unusually low for its score range. It is notably fast compared with similar models.
Archived model: this model is no longer updated or tested on new tests.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- 744B total (40B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Closed
- License
- -
Family size is reported; exact API snapshot is closed.
5.5
Consistency
9.2
N/A
$0.032
Total Output Tokens
1,775
Total Input Tokens
0
Input Price
$1.200 / 1M
Output Price
$4.000 / 1M
Flaky tests
2
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 13:05 Re-test | 5.1 | 10.0 | $0.047 ↑ | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:05 Re-test | 5.1 | 10.0 | $0.047 ↑ | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:05 New test added | 5.2 | 10.0 | $0.047 ↑ | Compare | |
| 2026-05-21 23:41 Suite changed | 5.3 | 10.0 | $0.037 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-11 01:19 First recorded run | 5.5 | N/A | $0.032 | Current run |
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-11 01:19 · First recorded run | 54/54 attempts | 5.5 | 9.2 | N/A | 6/18 | 2 | 1,775 | 0 | $0.032 | 2.94s |
| 2026-05-21 23:41 · Suite changed | 60/60 attempts | 5.3 | 9.3 | 10.0 | 6/20 | 2 | 1,809 | 0 | $0.037 | 2.83s |
| Difference | — | +0.2 | -0.1 | 0 | 0 | -34 | 0 | -$0.006 | +114ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 54/54 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 60/60 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 5.3 | 3.4 | |
| Combined | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 5.3 | 10.0 | |
| General Intelligence | 4.2 | 9.9 | |
| Instructions following | 6.5 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 5.5 | 7.4 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 |