#70 MiMo-V2-Pro
none
This model has been deprecated. It is recommended to migrate to xiaomi/mimo-v2.5-pro
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 0.1s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Summary
Mimo V2 PRO scores 6.0 on AI BENCHY and ranks #70. It has N/A reliability, a 48.2% pass rate, $0.043 total cost, and 2.39s average response time.
What makes Mimo V2 PRO unique: It stands out most in Coding, where it ranks #1, while Anti-AI Tricks is its weakest area at #18. Its total benchmark cost is unusually low for its score range. It is notably fast compared with similar models.
Archived model: this model is no longer updated or tested on new tests.
Identity note
Hunter Alpha was the stealth version of Mimo V2 PRO.
6.0
Consistency
8.6
N/A
$0.043
Total Output Tokens
2,320
Total Input Tokens
0
Input Price
$1.000 / 1M
Output Price
$3.000 / 1M
Flaky tests
3
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 13:47 New test added | 5.6 | 10.0 | $0.045 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-05-22 00:20 Suite changed | 5.7 | 10.0 | $0.047 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-11 01:44 First recorded run | 6.0 | N/A | $0.043 | Current run |
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-11 01:44 · First recorded run | 18/18 tests · 54/54 attempts | 6.0 | 8.6 | N/A | 7/18 | 3 | 2,320 | 0 | $0.043 | 2.39s |
| 2026-06-04 13:47 · New test added | 21/21 tests · 63/63 attempts | 5.6 | 8.4 | 10.0 | 7/21 | 3 | 2,352 | 39,344 | $0.045 | 2.27s |
| Difference | — | +0.4 | +0.2 | 0 | 0 | -32 | -39344 | -$0.003 | +117ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 18/18 tests · 54/54 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 21/21 tests · 63/63 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 3.5 | 8.0 | |
| Coding | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 5.3 | 7.2 | |
| General Intelligence | 4.3 | 9.9 | |
| Instructions following | 6.5 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 6.0 | 7.1 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 |