#128 Mimo V2 PRO
medium
This model has been deprecated. It is recommended to migrate to xiaomi/mimo-v2.5-pro
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 0.1s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Summary
Mimo V2 PRO scores 6.3 on AI BENCHY and ranks #128. It has 9.6 reliability, a 69.7% pass rate, $0.333 total cost, and 22.16s average response time.
What makes Mimo V2 PRO unique: It stands out most in Coding, where it ranks #2, while Combined is its weakest area at #16.
Archived model: this model is no longer updated or tested on new tests.
Identity note
Hunter Alpha was the stealth version of Mimo V2 PRO.
6.3
Consistency
7.7
9.6
Total Output Tokens
84,319
Total Input Tokens
40,961
Input Price
$2.653 / 1M
Output Price
$2.653 / 1M
Flaky tests
5
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 13:47 New test added | 6.3 | 9.6 | $0.333 ↑ | Current run | |
| 2026-05-22 00:25 Suite changed | 7.6 | 9.5 | $0.295 | Compare | |
| 2026-05-08 15:32 Suite changed | 7.7 | 9.4 | $0.212 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-11 01:44 First recorded run | 8.1 | N/A | $0.159 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 13:47 · Current run | 21/22 tests · 63/66 attempts | 6.3 | 7.7 | 9.6 | 12/21 | 5 | 84,319 | 40,961 | $0.333 | 22.16s |
| 2026-04-11 01:44 · First recorded run | 18/18 tests · 48/54 attempts | 8.1 | 8.6 | N/A | 12/18 | 3 | 40,680 | 0 | $0.159 | 12.27s |
| Difference | — | -1.8 | -0.9 | 0 | +2 | +43639 | +40961 | +$0.174 | +9892ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 21/21 tests · 63/63 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 18/18 tests · 48/54 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 15:40 | $2.653 / 1M | $2.653 / 1M |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 6.0 | 7.4 | |
| Combined | 2.3 | 8.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 7.3 | 5.8 | |
| Domain specific | 5.3 | 10.0 | |
| General Intelligence | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 9.9 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 6.4 | 4.4 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |