AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com
#189

Qwen3.5-Flash

Qwen Release: 2026-02-24 Tested on: 2026-10-01 00:56 qwen/qwen3.5-flash-02-23::none
~35B total (~3B active)MoEClosedEstimated
(medium) (none)

Summary

Qwen3.5-Flash scores 6.7 on AI BENCHY and ranks #189. It has 10.0 reliability, a 37.7% pass rate, $0.089 total cost, and 26.52s average response time.

What makes Qwen3.5-Flash unique: It stands out most in Domain specific, where it ranks #3, while Anti-AI Tricks is its weakest area at #17.

Model facts

Researched on 2026-08-12

Estimated
Parameters
~35B total (~3B active)
Architecture
MoE
Availability
Closed
License
-

Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Estimate from the nearest released Qwen3.5 Flash-class checkpoint.

Score

6.7

Consistency

9.3

Total Output Tokens

219,122

Total Input Tokens

463,872

Input Price

$0.065 / 1M

Output Price

$0.260 / 1M

Cache Read Price

N/A

Cache Write Price

N/A

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Tests Correct

Wrong Tests: 15

Attempt pass rate: 37.7%

Flaky tests

2

Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).

Response Time (avg)

26.52s

Response Time (max): 480.96s

Response Time (total): 609.94s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#189 Qwen3.5-Flash

none
Cost
$0.003
Time
47.4s
Tokens
7,799 tok

Run history

Tested on Score Reliability Tests Correct Total Cost Compare
2026-10-01 00:56 Re-test 6.7 10.0 $0.089 Current run
2026-07-16 22:07 New test added 6.1 10.0 $0.073 ↓ Compare
2026-06-04 13:25 New test added 5.8 10.0 $0.005 ↓ Compare
2026-05-21 23:55 Suite changed 5.9 10.0 $0.006 Compare
2026-04-11 01:19 First recorded run 6.2 N/A $0.006 Compare

This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.

Run comparison

RunBenchmark coverageScoreConsistencyReliabilityTests CorrectFlaky testsTotal Output TokensTotal Input TokensTotal CostResponse Time (avg)
2026-10-01 00:56 · Current run69/69 attempts6.79.310.08/232219,122463,872$0.08926.52s
2026-07-16 22:07 · New test added66/66 attempts6.19.310.08/222209,201282,347$0.07325.28s
Difference—+0.60.00.000+9921+181525+$0.017+1236ms

Benchmark coverage differs: 69/69 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.

These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.

Charts

Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Quick Compare

Category Breakdown

Category Score Consistency Tests Correct
Agentic 10.0 10.0
Anti-AI Tricks 3.5 8.3
Coding 5.5 10.0
Combined 2.9 5.8
Data parsing and extraction 10.0 10.0
Domain specific 5.3 10.0
General Intelligence 10.0 10.0
Instructions following 6.3 10.0
Puzzle Solving 3.1 10.0
Tool Calling 10.0 10.0
Trivia 3.0 10.0

Compared models