#121 Mistral Small 4
medium- Cost
- $0.006
- Time
- 47.9s
- Tokens
- 9,857 tok
Mistral
Release: 2026-03-16
Tested on: 2026-05-22 00:16
mistralai/mistral-small-2603::medium
119B total (6B active)MoEOpen source
(medium)
(none)
Summary
Mistral Small 4 scores 5.4 on AI BENCHY and ranks #121. It has 10.0 reliability, a 45.0% pass rate, $0.056 total cost, and 8.33s average response time.
What makes Mistral Small 4 unique: It stands out most in Domain specific, where it ranks #4, while Coding is its weakest area at #18. Its total benchmark cost is unusually low for its score range.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- 119B total (6B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Open source
- License
- Apache-2.0
The vendor also reports 8B active when embeddings are included; UI uses routed active parameters.
5.4
Consistency
7.1
10.0
$0.056
Total Output Tokens
89,683
Total Input Tokens
0
Input Price
$0.150 / 1M
Output Price
$0.600 / 1M
Flaky tests
7
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 02:05 Re-test | 5.1 | 10.0 | $0.097 | Compare | |
| 2026-07-16 22:23 New test added | 5.1 | 10.0 | $0.096 | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:43 New test added | 5.3 | 10.0 | $0.068 | Compare | |
| 2026-05-22 00:16 Suite changed | 5.4 | 10.0 | $0.056 | Current run | |
| 2026-04-11 01:44 First recorded run | 5.7 | N/A | $0.034 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-22 00:16 · Suite changed | 60/60 attempts | 5.4 | 7.1 | 10.0 | 5/20 | 7 | 89,683 | 0 | $0.056 | 8.33s |
| 2026-04-11 01:44 · First recorded run | 54/54 attempts | 5.7 | 6.8 | N/A | 5/18 | 7 | 54,492 | 0 | $0.034 | 5.64s |
| Difference | — | -0.3 | +0.3 | 0 | 0 | +35191 | 0 | +$0.022 | +2689ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 60/60 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 54/54 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Mistral Small 4mediumvsMistral Small 4noneMistral Small 4mediumvsGranite 4.2 8BlowMistral Small 4mediumvsNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree AvailableMistral Small 4mediumvsQwen3 Coder NextnoneMistral Small 4mediumvsGranite 4.2 8BmediumMistral Small 4mediumvsMercury 2.5lowMistral Small 4mediumvsInklingnoneMistral Small 4mediumvsMiMo-V2.5noneMistral Small 4mediumvsDots 3 Note PreviewnoneFree AvailableMistral Small 4mediumvsQwen3.5-9Bnone
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 5.6 | 3.8 | |
| Coding | 5.1 | 6.8 | |
| Combined | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 7.3 | 5.9 | |
| Domain specific | 5.3 | 7.2 | |
| General Intelligence | 4.8 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 7.3 | 5.8 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 3.4 | 9.7 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |