AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com
#100

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

Google Release: 2026-03-03 Tested on: 2026-07-16 22:52 google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview::none
~150B total (~10B active)MoEClosedEstimated

Summary

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview scores 6.4 on AI BENCHY and ranks #100. It has 10.0 reliability, a 57.6% pass rate, $0.052 total cost, and 1.58s average response time.

What makes Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview unique: It stands out most in Instructions following, where it ranks #1, while General Intelligence is its weakest area at #18. Its total benchmark cost is unusually low for its score range. It is notably fast compared with similar models.

Identity note

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview was the preview version of Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite.

Model facts

Researched on 2026-08-12

Estimated
Parameters
~150B total (~10B active)
Architecture
MoE
Availability
Closed
License
-

Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Google does not disclose parameter counts.

Score

6.4

Consistency

9.7

Total Output Tokens

14,292

Total Input Tokens

120,942

Input Price

$0.250 / 1M

Output Price

$1.500 / 1M

Tests Correct

Wrong Tests: 10

Attempt pass rate: 57.6%

Flaky tests

1

Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).

Response Time (avg)

1.58s

Response Time (max): 9.27s

Response Time (total): 34.72s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#100 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

none
Cost
$0.003
Time
4.7s
Tokens
1,827 tok

Run history

Tested on Score Reliability Tests Correct Total Cost Compare
2026-08-14 02:43 Re-test 6.4 10.0 $0.052 Compare
2026-07-16 22:52 New test added 6.4 10.0 $0.052 Current run
2026-06-04 14:00 New test added 7.2 10.0 $0.018 Compare
2026-05-22 00:27 Suite changed 7.5 10.0 $0.017 Compare
2026-04-11 01:44 First recorded run 7.9 N/A $0.016 Compare

This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.

Run comparison

RunBenchmark coverageScoreConsistencyReliabilityTests CorrectFlaky testsTotal Output TokensTotal Input TokensTotal CostResponse Time (avg)
2026-07-16 22:52 · New test added66/66 attempts6.49.710.012/22114,292120,942$0.0521.58s
2026-04-11 01:44 · First recorded run54/54 attempts7.99.6N/A12/1815,3610$0.0161.30s
Difference-1.5+0.100+8931+120942+$0.037+277ms

Benchmark coverage differs: 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 54/54 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.

These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.

Price History

Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.

Date Input Price Output Price
2026-06-04 15:40 $0.250 / 1M $1.500 / 1M

Charts

Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Quick Compare

Category Breakdown

Category Score Consistency Tests Correct
Anti-AI Tricks 7.5 8.4
Coding 5.5 10.0
Combined 3.0 10.0
Data parsing and extraction 10.0 10.0
Domain specific 5.3 10.0
General Intelligence 4.0 10.0
Instructions following 10.0 10.0
Puzzle Solving 10.0 10.0
Tool Calling 10.0 10.0
Trivia 3.0 10.0

Compared models