#184 Gemini 2.5 Flash
none
Invalid SVG
- Cost
- $0.164
- Time
- 215.5s
- Tokens
- 65,659 tok
Google
Release: 2025-06-17
Tested on: 2026-08-14 02:44
google/gemini-2.5-flash::none
~350B total (~20B active)MoEClosedEstimated
(medium)
(none)
Summary
Gemini 2.5 Flash scores 6.0 on AI BENCHY and ranks #184. It has 10.0 reliability, a 39.4% pass rate, $0.017 total cost, and 6.19s average response time.
What makes Gemini 2.5 Flash unique: It stands out most in Instructions following, where it ranks #1, while Anti-AI Tricks is its weakest area at #15.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- ~350B total (~20B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Closed
- License
- -
Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Google does not disclose parameter counts.
6.0
Consistency
9.6
10.0
$0.017
Total Output Tokens
1,890
Total Input Tokens
39,886
Input Price
$0.300 / 1M
Output Price
$2.500 / 1M
Flaky tests
1
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 02:44 Re-test | 6.0 | 10.0 | $0.017 | Current run | |
| 2026-07-16 22:58 New test added | 6.2 | 10.0 | $0.017 | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 14:00 New test added | 6.2 | 10.0 | $0.016 | Compare | |
| 2026-05-22 00:28 Suite changed | 6.2 | 10.0 | $0.015 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-11 01:44 First recorded run | 6.2 | N/A | $0.013 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 02:44 · Current run | 66/66 attempts | 6.0 | 9.6 | 10.0 | 8/22 | 1 | 1,890 | 39,886 | $0.017 | 6.19s |
| 2026-05-22 00:28 · Suite changed | 60/60 attempts | 6.2 | 9.2 | 10.0 | 8/20 | 2 | 1,762 | 0 | $0.015 | 893ms |
| Difference | — | -0.1 | +0.4 | 0.0 | 0 | -1 | +128 | +39886 | +$0.003 | +5299ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 60/60 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 12:51 | $0.300 / 1M | $2.500 / 1M |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Gemini 2.5 FlashnonevsTrinity Large ThinkinglowGemini 2.5 FlashnonevsGPT-5.6 TerranoneGemini 2.5 FlashnonevsNemotron 3 UltranoneFree AvailableGemini 2.5 FlashnonevsGPT-5 NanomediumGemini 2.5 FlashnonevsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20noneGemini 2.5 FlashnonevsQwen3.5-FlashnoneGemini 2.5 FlashnonevsGemma 4 31BnoneFree AvailableGemini 2.5 FlashnonevsQwen3.5-35B-A3BnoneGemini 2.5 FlashnonevsQwen3.6 FlashnoneGemini 2.5 FlashnonevsStep 3.5 Flashmedium
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 5.5 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 3.6 | 7.2 | |
| General Intelligence | 5.0 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 7.7 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |