Navigasi
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Model yang Dibandingkan

Perbandingan benchmark Grok 4.6 (high) vs Seed 2.1 Turbo (low) vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (low) vs Seed-2.0-Code (low): Grok 4.6 (high) unggul pada Skor dengan 9.3. Grok 4.6 (high) unggul pada Keandalan dengan 10.0. Seed-2.0-Code (low) memiliki Total Biaya terendah di $0.767. Seed-2.0-Code (low) paling cepat di 72.24s.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-09-24

Model yang Dibandingkan

Peringkat
#19
Total token output
282,217
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
84.15s
Total Biaya
$1.908
Peringkat
#28
Total token output
597,236
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
163.90s
Total Biaya
$1.546
Peringkat
#78
Total token output
495,541
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
118.97s
Total Biaya
$2.672
Peringkat
#106
Total token output
241,309
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
72.24s
Total Biaya
$0.767
Model yang direkomendasikan Grok 4.6 (high)

It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.3) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 4 models.

Perbandingan terperinci

Metrik Grok 4.6 Grok 4.6 high Rilis: 2026-08-12 Seed 2.1 Turbo Seed 2.1 Turbo low Rilis: 2026-08-12 Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B low Rilis: 2026-08-12 Seed-2.0-Code Seed-2.0-Code low Rilis: 2026-08-12
Skor 9.3 9.1 8.1 7.7
Peringkat #19 #28 #78 #106
Keandalan 10.0 10.0 9.4 8.5
Konsistensi 10.0 9.2 9.2 7.8
Percobaan 66/66 66/66 66/66 66/66
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 86.4% 80.3% 72.7% 77.3%
Tes tidak stabil 0 2 2 6
Total Run 66 66 66 66
Biaya per hasil 10.042 9.091 17.812 5.899
Total Biaya $1.908 $1.546 $2.672 $0.767
Harga input $2.000 / 1M $0.500 / 1M $2.000 / 1M $0.500 / 1M
Harga output $6.000 / 1M $2.500 / 1M $6.000 / 1M $3.000 / 1M
Total token input 107,275 104,464 113,279 85,657
Token output 5,094 6,844 121,045 8,142
Token penalaran 277,123 590,392 374,496 233,167
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 84.15s 163.90s 118.97s 72.24s
Waktu respons (maks) 618.49s 739.98s 534.21s 485.92s
Waktu respons (total) 1851.26s 3605.87s 2617.41s 1589.31s
Parameter ~1.7T total (~170B aktif) ~200B total (~20B aktif) 2.4T total (95B aktif) ~200B total (~20B aktif)
Ketersediaan Tertutup Tertutup Bobot tersedia Tertutup

Showcase generasi model

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#19 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6

high
Biaya
$0.107
Waktu
265.1s
Token
18,001 tok

#28 Seed 2.1 Turbo

low
Biaya
$0.049
Waktu
298.8s
Token
19,730 tok

#78 Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

low
Biaya
$0.100
Waktu
193.2s
Token
16,767 tok

#106 Seed-2.0-Code

low
Provider returned error
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
0.3s
Token
0 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Grok 4.6 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 102.20s 9,579 379 51,829
Seed 2.1 Turbo 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 360.85s 8,220 385 207,368
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B 7.8 9.3 66.7% 0 172.53s 6,716 21,405 57,399
Seed-2.0-Code 7.0 7.1 55.6% 1 109.70s 7,948 455 55,759

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan

Seed-2.0-CodelowvsGLM 5mediumGPT-5.5lowvsGrok 4.6highGPT-5 MinimediumvsQwen3.8 2.4T A95BlowMuse Glimmer 30BxhighvsQwen3.8 2.4T A95BlowClaude Opus 4.6mediumvsSeed-2.0-CodelowClaude Opus 5.5lowvsGrok 4.6highSeed 2.1 TurbolowvsGemini 3.8 FlashmediumSeed-2.0-CodelowvsQwen3.7 FlashhighGPT-6 AstramediumvsGrok 4.6highGPT-5.6 SolmediumvsGrok 4.6highGPT-6 SolmediumvsGrok 4.6highQwen3.8 2.4T A95BlowvsGrok 4.7medium