Navigasi
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Model yang Dibandingkan

Perbandingan benchmark Grok 4.6 (high) vs Seed 2.1 Turbo (low) vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (low) vs Seed-2.0-Code (low): Grok 4.6 (high) unggul pada Skor dengan 9.2. Grok 4.6 (high) unggul pada Keandalan dengan 10.0. Seed-2.0-Code (low) memiliki Total Biaya terendah di $0.681. Seed-2.0-Code (low) paling cepat di 65.89s.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-08-12

Peringkat
#11
Total token output
265,604
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
79.38s
Total Biaya
$1.809
Peringkat
#15
Total token output
631,257
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
168.41s
Total Biaya
$1.631
Peringkat
#46
Total token output
554,485
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
132.39s
Total Biaya
$3.113
Peringkat
#66
Total token output
212,558
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
65.89s
Total Biaya
$0.681
Model yang direkomendasikan Grok 4.6 (high)

It has the best score here (9.2), while responding about 1.5x faster than model lain dalam perbandingan ini.

Perbandingan terperinci

Metrik Grok 4.6 Grok 4.6 high Rilis: 2026-08-12 Seed 2.1 Turbo Seed 2.1 Turbo low Rilis: 2026-08-12 Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B low Rilis: 2026-08-12 Seed-2.0-Code Seed-2.0-Code low Rilis: 2026-08-12
Skor 9.2 9.1 8.2 7.7
Peringkat #11 #15 #46 #66
Keandalan 10.0 9.9 9.1 5.7
Konsistensi 9.6 8.9 8.9 7.5
Percobaan 66/66 66/66 66/66 66/66
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 84.9% 83.3% 78.8% 80.3%
Tes tidak stabil 1 3 3 7
Total Run 66 66 66 66
Biaya per hasil 10.046 9.591 19.453 5.235
Total Biaya $1.809 $1.631 $3.113 $0.681
Harga input $2.000 / 1M $0.500 / 1M $2.000 / 1M $0.500 / 1M
Harga output $6.000 / 1M $2.500 / 1M $6.000 / 1M $3.000 / 1M
Total token input 107,266 104,483 113,340 85,648
Token output 5,094 6,848 107,311 8,142
Token penalaran 260,510 624,409 447,174 204,416
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 79.38s 168.41s 132.39s 65.89s
Waktu respons (maks) 618.49s 739.98s 534.21s 485.92s
Waktu respons (total) 1746.29s 3705.09s 2912.56s 1449.53s
Parameter ~1.7T total (~170B aktif) ~200B total (~20B aktif) 2.4T total (95B aktif) ~200B total (~20B aktif)
Ketersediaan Tertutup Tertutup Bobot tersedia Tertutup

Showcase generasi model

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#11 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6

high
Biaya
$0.107
Waktu
265.1s
Token
18,001 tok

#15 Seed 2.1 Turbo

low
Biaya
$0.049
Waktu
298.8s
Token
19,730 tok

#46 Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

low
Biaya
$0.100
Waktu
193.2s
Token
16,767 tok

#66 Seed-2.0-Code

low
Provider returned error
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
0.3s
Token
0 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Grok 4.6 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 102.20s 9,579 379 51,829
Seed 2.1 Turbo 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 360.85s 8,220 385 207,368
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 172.53s 6,716 21,405 57,399
Seed-2.0-Code 7.0 5.0 77.8% 2 109.70s 7,948 455 55,759

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan

Seed 2.1 TurbolowvsGemini 3.5 FlashmediumSeed 2.1 TurbolowvsQwen3.8 MaxmediumSeed-2.0-CodelowvsGLM 5mediumGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewmediumvsGrok 4.6highClaude Opus 5mediumvsGrok 4.6highSeed 2.1 TurbolowvsQwen3.7 MaxmediumClaude Opus 4.6mediumvsSeed-2.0-CodelowSeed-2.0-CodelowvsGPT-5.6 LunahighSeed-2.0-CodelowvsSolar Pro 4xhighMuse Glimmer 30BxhighvsQwen3.8 2.4T A95BlowSeed-2.0-CodelowvsQwen3.7 FlashhighSeed-2.0-CodelowvsDeepSeek V4 Flashhigh