#152 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
none- Biaya
- $0.016
- Waktu
- 44.5s
- Token
- 6,431 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Ringkasan
Qwen3.5-27B unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 5.9 vs 5.3. Qwen3.5-27B memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.015 vs $0.020. Qwen3.5-27B lebih cepat di 1.68s vs 3.41s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 31.8% vs 38.1%.
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-14
| Metrik | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none | Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B none |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 5.3 | 5.9 |
| Peringkat | #152 | #128 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 9.6 | 9.3 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 31.8% | 38.1% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 1 | 2 |
| Total Run | 63 | 63 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.393 | 0.249 |
| Total Biaya | $0.020 | $0.015 |
| Harga input | $0.260 / 1M | $0.195 / 1M |
| Harga output | $2.080 / 1M | $1.560 / 1M |
| Total token input | 47,735 | 44,478 |
| Token output | 3,383 | 3,592 |
| Token penalaran | 0 | 0 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 3.41s | 1.68s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 46.00s | 9.39s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 71.59s | 35.25s |
Showcase generasi
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | 3.7 | 7.0 | 22.2% | 1 | 2.77s | 7,913 | 693 | 0 | |
| Qwen3.5-27B | 5.8 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 1.80s | 7,913 | 415 | 0 |
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan