Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 7.8 vs 7.9. Qwen3.7 Plus (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.267 vs $0.676. GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) lebih cepat di 7.11s vs 51.51s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 69.7% vs 75.8%.

Model yang direkomendasikanGPT-5.6 Terra (medium)It has the best score here (7.8), while responding about 7.2x faster than Qwen3.7 Plus (medium).

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-18

Metrik GPT-5.6 Terra GPT-5.6 Terra medium Rilis: 2026-07-09 Qwen3.7 Plus Qwen3.7 Plus medium Rilis: 2026-06-03
Skor 7.8 7.9
Peringkat #39 #36
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 9.3 8.9
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 69.7% 75.8%
Tes tidak stabil 2 3
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 4.825 2.072
Total Biaya $0.676 $0.267
Harga input $2.500 / 1M $0.320 / 1M
Harga output $15.000 / 1M $1.280 / 1M
Total token input 79,175 115,233
Token output 4,878 6,162
Token penalaran 26,952 173,267
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 7.11s 51.51s
Waktu respons (maks) 41.68s 315.30s
Waktu respons (total) 156.42s 1133.15s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#39 GPT-5.6 Terra

medium
Biaya
$0.035
Waktu
16.3s
Token
2,418 tok

#36 Qwen3.7 Plus

medium
Biaya
$0.018
Waktu
193.2s
Token
10,821 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
GPT-5.6 Terra 6.1 7.2 55.6% 1 7.19s 7,302 427 4,527
Qwen3.7 Plus 6.1 6.6 55.6% 1 108.60s 6,472 414 43,576

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan